Select Page
Dito a Chinese Communist tool for spying – lawmakers

Dito a Chinese Communist tool for spying – lawmakers

logo of Dito Telecommunity

written on September 1, 2021

 

Alarms intensify about Communist China’s partly owned Dito Telecommunity being a tool for spying on the Philippines. This, amid Chinese military cyber-attacks on the Japanese and Australian governments, and tech giant Microsoft.

Senator Risa Hontiveros accused state firm China Telecom of using Philippine partner Dito as Trojan horse for cyber-espionage. Senator James McGrath of Queensland, Australia, warned that ChinaTel and Dito can be used against Philippine allies and foreign companies.

Hontiveros in a statement pressed for a security audit by the National Security Council of the country’s third telco Dito to assess foreign threats. “I wouldn’t be surprised if ChinaTel bought into Dito to boost its espionage, especially since China covets our territory,” she said in Filipino. “Perhaps Dito is indeed China’s Trojan horse, that’s why I continue to check on Dito as well as the NSC to ensure our national security will not be vulnerable.”

A “Trojan horse” is a person or thing intended secretly to undermine an enemy. In info-tech, it is a program designed to breach the security of a communication network while ostensibly performing some innocuous function.

The Philippines has no operations center to defend against cyber-attacks on a national level. National Security Adviser Hermogenes Esperon made that admission last December in a Senate hearing on Dito’s 25-year franchise.

Hontiveros and colleagues have been questioning the defense department’s allowing Dito to set up cell sites inside military camps. The multibillion-dollar firm is 60-percent owned by businessman Dennis Uy, President Duterte’s biggest campaign contributor. It bagged a government bidding for the third telco after Duterte invited ChinaTel to invest.

In the Senate hearing, Esperon confirmed Hontiveros’ report about a China-linked hacking group penetrating Asia-Pacific government agencies. Naikon breaks into and surveils state networks.

In a speech, McGrath cautioned about the Chinese Communist Party’s use of its instrumentalities for cyber-sabotage. “Many are concerned that Dito is a [tool] for spying, including on the Armed Forces of the Philippines and its allies the United States and Australia,” he said. “When we consider how many Australian companies house parts of their businesses in the Philippines, such as call centers, this should ring alarm bells with cybersecurity experts.”

An “iron silk curtain” is being drawn around Southeast Asia as China expands its influence, McGrath added. “While China has continued with its wolf-warrior diplomacy and while territorial concerns continue to be raised, including in seas off Japan, Vietnam and the Philippines, the CCP and its military arm have been quietly making strategic acquisitions of another kind.”

The Australian lawmaker outlined China’s regional design. “We must be awake to the Philippines being one of the first dominoes at risk of falling to the nefarious influence of the CCP,” he said. Asia-Pacific consulting firm Creator Tech recently released a study on the new telco that raised serious concerns about China’s entry into the Philippines’ telecoms industry.

Last month, Tokyo police disclosed cyber-attacks by China’s People’s Liberation Army. Targeted since 2016 were the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) and 200 other companies and research institutes. A frequent victim of Chinese hacking, Japan has since improved its cybersecurity.

In the attack on JAXA, police first discovered a suspicious web server. It turned out to have been opened through a fake account of a Chinese systems engineer in Tokyo who is a CCP member. The suspect has since fled but accomplices and witnesses have implicated him. With its findings, Tokyo has been deluged with requests for information and help by countries similarly harmed by the CCP and PLA.

Last year, in a major security breach, Australia was hit by a large-scale cyber attack by a “Chinese state-based actor.” The incident led to tightening of the country’s cyber security.

In July, China’s Ministry of State Security orchestrated an attack on Microsoft Exchange that affected at least 30,000 servers worldwide. America, Britain and the European Union denounced what western security services called “a shift from targeted espionage campaigns to smash-and-grab raids.” China’s cyber malice is now under close watch despite Beijing’s denial of misbehavior.

In a webinar Monday by Australia Strategic Policy Institute, experts from East and Southeast Asia reiterated concern for peace and security. Nations must strengthen cyber security in light of China’s aggression in the East and South China Seas, they said.

To dispel suspicions of cyber-espionage and -sabotage, Dito has hired US security consultants. But China’s National Intelligence Law obligates its companies and citizens to support domestic and overseas espionage, and to keep such participation secret. Beijing has required all firms, especially tech and finance, to have Communist Party cells. In state corporations, the top executives comprise the CCP units.

Former Supreme Court justice Antonio Carpio noted that newbie Dito is inexpert in telecoms so will depend on CCP-led ChinaTel. If the CCP orders ChinaTel to install back doors and spyware, then it can eavesdrop and sabotage the Philippines. The Armed Forces would be vulnerable because of Dito’s privilege to install cell sites in all camps.

Sinovac safety efficacy and price still need clarifying

Sinovac safety efficacy and price still need clarifying

* * *

Catch “Sapol” radio show, Saturdays, 8-10 a.m., dwIZ (882-AM)

            “Gotcha: An Exposé on the Philippine Government” is available as e-book and paperback. Get a free copy of “Chapter 1: Beijing’s Bullying and Duplicity”. Simply subscribe to my newsletter HERE. Book orders also accepted there.

Sinovac safety efficacy and price still need clarifying

Duterte vs Duterte: a fight over political inheritance

Duterte vs Duterte: a fight over political inheritance

photo from Philippine News Agency

written on August 27, 2021

 

Government’s brute-force approach to the pandemic is failing. Ex-generals’ wide-scale lockdowns and curfews net thousands of violators everyday. Machinegun-mounted armored personnel carriers deploy in street corners. Yet people keep sneaking out – to work or just for a whiff of fresh air away from their cramped, humid shanties. President Duterte’s threat to have recalcitrants “shot on sight” goes unheeded. The hungry hear only the grumbling stomachs of crying children. State “ayuda” is delayed and insufficient. Charitable activists who organize community pantries are red-tagged as “communist party.”

Macho populism isn’t working. Duterte’s displays of manly protectiveness – “Ako ang bahala sa inyo, maniwala kayo” – don’t jibe with “wala nang pera pang-ayuda.” “Tell me where the vee-rus lives so I can slap it” negates efforts to inform that the enemy is microscopic yet deadly. The ex-generals are slow to procure, store and distribute vaccines. Cussing skeptics and the un-injected only makes people desperate. Malacañang hoots down the “pasaway.” Yet it’s OK when they crowd unmasked to ogle the ex-generals’ wasteful multibillion-peso fake Manila Bay white beach.

Faulty pandemic response breeds fund misuse. Deficiencies mar DOH’s documentation of P67.3-billion COVID-19 spending. Billions of pesos more in expiring medicines remain undistributed. Special risk allowances of pandemic frontline nurses remain unpaid. So are tens of billions in reimbursements of private hospitals’ cash advances for COVID-19 treatment. The impression is that universal health care is collapsing.

For all that, Duterte blames state auditors. He wants them to lie that there is no corruption in the questioned spending. Yet papers can show otherwise. Behind DOH’s P29-billion purchase of pricey face masks and shields is a cautionary limit from budget officials to only two percent of the amount. Duterte prematurely exonerates the health secretary, preempting ongoing investigations by his Presidential Anti-Corruption Commission.

Other agencies are as wasteful. Land transport regulators released only 1.07 percent of P5.58 billion to hire displaced jitney drivers as shuttle service. To earn a living back in their old routes, the drivers resort to 100-percent passenger loading instead of only half for safe distancing. Others turn to begging in the streets. The overseas workers’ fund purchased overpriced feminine napkins from a construction supplies store that can no longer be located. Education officials underspent for online teaching equipment and materials. State auditors also flagged the Departments of Information and Communication Technology, Social Welfare and Development, Labor and Employment, Interior and Local Government, and Environment and Natural Resources. Duterte tells his Cabinet to ignore the auditors.

Meanwhile, his 2016 campaign contributors quietly are bagging lucrative government deals. Congress allies are busy crafting self-serving laws, if not disenfranchising critical broadcasters and politicizing epidemiology. Vaccine procurement is being used to suck up to Beijing. The ex-general in charge even wants Philippine maritime jurisdiction set aside for Sinovac donations. No protection is accorded Filipino fishers to increase food supply against Chinese poachers.

A subplot was the ruling PDP-Laban’s endorsement of Duterte as vice presidential candidate with choice of standard bearer. As backdrop, Duterte loyalists first wrested the party leadership from another “presidentiable,” Senator Manny Pacquiao.

Duterte used his weekly pandemic broadcasts as teleserye. One episode he devoted to advising Sara to spare herself the headaches of a gruelling presidency. Another time he said the vice presidency interested him. Then he floated Go’s name for president. This week he firmed up his VP intention. On cue, PDP-Laban top officers endorsed Go as presidential candidate.

Sara must be watching intently. PDP-Laban has announced five of 12 senatorial candidates. Sara supposedly detests two loudmouths among them.

Who Sara will pick as runningmate is now subject of murmurs. Bongbong Marcos of Ilocos and cousin Martin Romualdez of Leyte are possibilities, as is Gilbert Teodoro of Tarlac. Then again she might not need one. The 2016 election showed that a presidential wannabe can run without a VP and vice-versa. The mismatched presidential multiparty system makes that possible.

Intriguers spice up the storyline. They convinced Duterte to become VP to continue enjoying immunity from suit. They forget that a VP has no such privilege. In 2019 the police charged VP Leni Robredo with sedition. It’s the intriguers who need protection by keeping Duterte in power. When Duterte is gone, they will go to jail while on trial for plunder.

Sinovac safety efficacy and price still need clarifying

Sinovac safety efficacy and price still need clarifying

* * *

Catch “Sapol” radio show, Saturdays, 8-10 a.m., dwIZ (882-AM)

            “Gotcha: An Exposé on the Philippine Government” is available as e-book and paperback. Get a free copy of “Chapter 1: Beijing’s Bullying and Duplicity”. Simply subscribe to my newsletter HERE. Book orders also accepted there.

Sinovac safety efficacy and price still need clarifying

Govt’s brute-force approach to pandemic failing; what now?

Govt’s brute-force approach to pandemic failing; what now?

photo from Philippine News Agency

written on August 25, 2021

 

Government’s brute-force approach to the pandemic is failing. Ex-generals’ wide-scale lockdowns and curfews net thousands of violators everyday. Machinegun-mounted armored personnel carriers deploy in street corners. Yet people keep sneaking out – to work or just for a whiff of fresh air away from their cramped, humid shanties. President Duterte’s threat to have recalcitrants “shot on sight” goes unheeded. The hungry hear only the grumbling stomachs of crying children. State “ayuda” is delayed and insufficient. Charitable activists who organize community pantries are red-tagged as “communist party.”

Macho populism isn’t working. Duterte’s displays of manly protectiveness – “Ako ang bahala sa inyo, maniwala kayo” – don’t jibe with “wala nang pera pang-ayuda.” “Tell me where the vee-rus lives so I can slap it” negates efforts to inform that the enemy is microscopic yet deadly. The ex-generals are slow to procure, store and distribute vaccines. Cussing skeptics and the un-injected only makes people desperate. Malacañang hoots down the “pasaway.” Yet it’s OK when they crowd unmasked to ogle the ex-generals’ wasteful multibillion-peso fake Manila Bay white beach.

Faulty pandemic response breeds fund misuse. Deficiencies mar DOH’s documentation of P67.3-billion COVID-19 spending. Billions of pesos more in expiring medicines remain undistributed. Special risk allowances of pandemic frontline nurses remain unpaid. So are tens of billions in reimbursements of private hospitals’ cash advances for COVID-19 treatment. The impression is that universal health care is collapsing.

For all that, Duterte blames state auditors. He wants them to lie that there is no corruption in the questioned spending. Yet papers can show otherwise. Behind DOH’s P29-billion purchase of pricey face masks and shields is a cautionary limit from budget officials to only two percent of the amount. Duterte prematurely exonerates the health secretary, preempting ongoing investigations by his Presidential Anti-Corruption Commission.

Other agencies are as wasteful. Land transport regulators released only 1.07 percent of P5.58 billion to hire displaced jitney drivers as shuttle service. To earn a living back in their old routes, the drivers resort to 100-percent passenger loading instead of only half for safe distancing. Others turn to begging in the streets. The overseas workers’ fund purchased overpriced feminine napkins from a construction supplies store that can no longer be located. Education officials underspent for online teaching equipment and materials. State auditors also flagged the Departments of Information and Communication Technology, Social Welfare and Development, Labor and Employment, Interior and Local Government, and Environment and Natural Resources. Duterte tells his Cabinet to ignore the auditors.

Meanwhile, his 2016 campaign contributors quietly are bagging lucrative government deals. Congress allies are busy crafting self-serving laws, if not disenfranchising critical broadcasters and politicizing epidemiology. Vaccine procurement is being used to suck up to Beijing. The ex-general in charge even wants Philippine maritime jurisdiction set aside for Sinovac donations. No protection is accorded Filipino fishers to increase food supply against Chinese poachers.

Daily COVID-19 infections are at all-time highs: Aug. 20, 17,231; Aug. 21, 16,694; Aug. 22, 16,044; Aug. 23, 18,332. And those are under-reported due to testing lapses.

Duterte admitted in his last State of the Nation Address in July that he doesn’t know what to do. He relies only on advice from aides. That’s expected. But instead of situation update and inspirational chat, he wastes weekly telecasts on tirades against critics, alternative thinkers and presidential contenders of his daughter. Once he scolded doctors, taunting them to revolt, for merely suggesting a time out to reassess strategies. No attention is given to long-festering youth malnutrition, learning crisis and early-teen pregnancy. Pork, poultry, sugar (and soon seafood) are overly imported to appease city consumers, to the detriment of rural producers. Watching the pandemic confusion, international lenders and rating bodies forecast the Philippines to be the last to recover economically among ASEAN states.

The Delta variant inevitably will infect millions, a Duterte adviser says. Its viral load is a thousand-fold higher than the Wuhan original. Contagion occurs within moments, no longer than 15 minutes. Carriers are asymptomatic and infectees are young.

What to do? Masking, handwashing and distancing, as usual. Then vaccinations against severity, hospitalization and death. Plus wider, swifter contact tracing, testing and isolation – the very protocols and programs where brute force and macho populism are failing.

Filipinos vent their dismay online. Duterte’s spokesman responds with distortions and distractions. Infections are surging nationwide but he cites only Metro Manila, rejoicing that hospitals there are not yet fully booked because of more vaccinations. He conveniently forgets that provincial crematoriums are overwhelmed. He then blabbers about the Philippines accepting Afghan refugees. He does not first ascertain if the National Intelligence Coordinating Agency and Bureau of Immigration can screen against secret religious fanatics and sleeper terrorists.

Sinovac safety efficacy and price still need clarifying

Sinovac safety efficacy and price still need clarifying

* * *

Catch “Sapol” radio show, Saturdays, 8-10 a.m., dwIZ (882-AM)

            “Gotcha: An Exposé on the Philippine Government” is available as e-book and paperback. Get a free copy of “Chapter 1: Beijing’s Bullying and Duplicity”. Simply subscribe to my newsletter HERE. Book orders also accepted there.

Sinovac safety efficacy and price still need clarifying

Duque in gov’t 18 years; why question COA now?

Duque in gov’t 18 years; why question COA now?

photo from Philippine News Agency

written on August 20, 2021

 

Francisco Duque III was administrator of Lyceum-Northwestern University, Dagupan City, in the 1980s-1990s. He was board director of the larger University of Pangasinan. There he must have appreciated the value of audits — of finances, performance, operations and inventories. Audits are never personal. Anchored on laws and conventions, they present in numbers and data a picture of the company.

Duque was also head of various government agencies for nearly 18 years. He was president of PhilHealth, health secretary, Civil Service Commission chairman and now again health secretary. He must be used to state audits.

All agencies undergo Commission on Audit scrutiny. Primarily answerable is the agency head. To be requested by the COA resident auditor for documents and explanations, and sometimes questioned and flagged, are normal. “Nothing to hide, nothing to fear.” Duque’s predecessors were audited too, like for the purchase of 1.8 million dengue vaccines.

Duque’s tenure at the Civil Service Commission must have reinforced in him the value of audits. For one, his agency awarded each year outstanding civil servants, among them COA personnel. For another, experts from the Institute for Solidarity in Asia audited his and the CSC’s work then, and cited them for good governance.

Away from public office for three years after his CSC stint, Duque trained as government career executive. Emphasized on graduates are accountability and integrity, tested by audits.

CSC chairmanship must have made Duque more aware than ever of COA’s importance. Since the Commonwealth, three agencies have been imbued with authority over the Executive, Legislative and Judiciary. Those are the CSC, COA and Commission on Elections. (The 1987 Constitution added two more, Office of the Ombudsman and Commission on Human Rights.)

Independently they perform specific constitutional functions. Neither the President, the Senate President, the House Speaker nor the Chief Justice can command them. Their budgets and procedures are off-limits to political or judicial hierarchs.

Incongruous with all these was Duque’s tirade against COA last Tuesday at the House of Representatives: “Winarak na ninyo kami. Winarak na ninyo ang dangal ng DOH. Winarak ninyo ang lahat ng mga kasama ko dito. Hindi kami makaharap sa tao dahil lahat ang dami-daming paratang. Wala pa rin akong tulog. Ilang gabi na ito… unfair, unjust.”

Duque took personally COA’s 2020 audits of all government agencies. Upon completion last June 30 as required by law, the audits were posted on the COA website. Among the items were “deficiencies” in documentation of P67.32 billion in pandemic spending of Duque’s Department of Health. Meaning, DOH had missed the submission deadlines for certain papers. Reacting to newspaper reports, Duque stammered that he’d rush the papers within a week. Calling it an alibi, senators and congressmen quickly scheduled investigations of potential anomalies.

Majority of senators and a growing number of congressmen have been telling Duque to resign since last year. Most are his friends; a few are oppositionists. All echo their constituents’ dismay with government’s paltry COVID-19 vaccinations, contact tracing and testing.

Word reached Malacañang, likely embellished by sycophants. In his usual Monday midnight pandemic telecast, President Rody Duterte told Duque to stay put. “It’s impossible to steal P67 billion,” he overreacted to COA. “Stop that flagging, goddamnit. Do not flag and do not publish it because it will condemn the agency or the person.” He barked a second illegal order, for the Cabinet to ignore COA.

Lawmakers, doctors, lawyers, academics, workers and farmers were stunned. Taxpayers were one in reminding Duterte of his promise to stamp out corruption. Of all those angry with corruption, only Duterte was blaming auditors.

Duque’s rant before congressmen the next day reflected his state of mind. He was no longer his usual affable, optimistic, eloquent self. In Tagalog, basag na ang pula; sira na ang naturalesa. Through it all, he did not explain anything about COA’s findings, former senator, now Sorsogon governor Francis Escudero noted.

The next day before senators, budget officials blamed DOH red tape for non-payment of special allowances to thousands of frontline health workers. Recalled was Duque’s first ever counter-pandemic recommendation to Duterte in March 2020 to not impose a lockout on Wuhanese lest it offend China. Recounted too was Foreign Secretary Teddy Locsin’s revelation that Duque had dropped the ball in 2020 on 10 million Pfizer vaccines from America. Previous inquiries had alleged that Duque leases a family-owned building in Dagupan to PhilHealth which he chairs. Also, that DOH buys medicines from his close kin. Should not the Ombudsman suspend him like it did eight negligent PhilHealth officials last year, Senator Grace Poe asked.

COA’s independence is being violated to suit one man. What next? At one point in the Senate hearing, Duque neglected to mute his microphone while muttering, “Nagulo na ‘yung utak ko, hindi ko na alam kung….” Senator Dick Gordon advised him to seek psychiatric help.

Sinovac safety efficacy and price still need clarifying

Sinovac safety efficacy and price still need clarifying

* * *

Catch “Sapol” radio show, Saturdays, 8-10 a.m., dwIZ (882-AM)

            “Gotcha: An Exposé on the Philippine Government” is available as e-book and paperback. Get a free copy of “Chapter 1: Beijing’s Bullying and Duplicity”. Simply subscribe to my newsletter HERE. Book orders also accepted there.

Sinovac safety efficacy and price still need clarifying

Impossible to steal P67 billion? These cases show otherwise

Impossible to steal P67 billion? These cases show otherwise

photo from Transparency International website

written on August 18, 2021

 

Only the naive will believe that it’s impossible to steal P67 billion. Documents, not bluster, can disprove allegations of President Duterte’s pandemic misspending. Telling the independent Commission on Audit to stop publishing its findings only heightens suspicion. Advising against resigning concentrates the fire on the health secretary.

Grand thefts in government abound. Serialized in this column in 2003 was the string of sleaze behind the $412-million construction of NAIA Terminal-3. In 2004 I exposed the P302-million plunder by the Armed Forces comptroller-general. I bared in 2007 the attempted national broadband network-ZTE scam, which had a P10-billion kickback, larger than the P7-billion project cost. Hearings on the P105-million police chopper scam of 2009 are wrapping up.

There were the P728-million ghost fertilizer scam of 2004 and the P10-billion pork barrel scam of 2013. Philippine firms participated in the $1-billion Bangladesh Bank cyber-heist of 2016. The ombudsman is investigating PhilHealth’s P15-billion overpayments in 2020. In the Guinness Book of World Records is Ferdinand Marcos’ plunder of $10 billion from 1972-1986.

On its 25th year in 2019, Transparency International compiled probes of “25 Corruption Scandals that Shook the World:”

(1) Siemens, Germany – Discovered in 2006 were $1.4 billion in bribes by the conglomerate to several governments, booked as tax-exempt “useful expenses,” for infrastructure contracts.

(2) Abacha, Nigeria – By his death in 1998, General Sani Abacha had pillaged $5 billion in five years from the Central Bank.

(3) Fujimori, Peru – During his presidency, Alberto Fujimori embezzled $600 million mostly in un-audited intelligence funds.

(4) Kadyrov, Chechnya – President Ramzan Kadyrov exacted from all wage earners up to $864 million a year ostensibly for homes and mosques, but also built private palaces and threw lavish parties.

(5) Ben Ali, Tunisia – From 1987 to 2011 president Ben Ali put up 220 family monopolies to amass $13 billion.

(6) Yanukovych, Ukraine – A golf course, ostrich farm, private zoo and a full-sized Spanish galleon were among the attractions at president Viktor Yanukovych’s 137-hectare estate, part of his $40 billion loot.

(7) Martinelli, Panama – While president from 2009-2014, Ricardo Martinelli took kickbacks from public contracts, including for school children’s meals and bags.

(8) 1MDB, Malaysia – Former prime minister Najib Razak is on trial for pocketing more than $4 billion from the development fund that he chaired.

(9) Russian-Moldovan Laundromat – Over $80 billion in public funds have been siphoned off and laundered in Moldova into Russian officials’ bank accounts in Europe.

(10) Gürtel, Spain – Tycoon Francisco Correa, alias Gürtel, funnelled bribes to the ruling party, even the office of the president, for dirty public deals.

(11) Venezuela – South America’s richest country 20 years ago, Venezuela is in political and humanitarian crisis after the plunder of the state-owned oil company.

(12) Panama Papers – Leaked files of the Mossack Fonseca law firm listed 214,000 shell companies of money-launderers, including 140 politicians and 12 leaders of foreign governments.

(13) Maldives – Unearthed in 2016 were $1.5 billion in bribes, including to president Abdulla Yameen, for no-bidding leases of 50 islands and submerged coral lagoons.

(14) Obiang, Equatorial Guinea – Teodorín Obiang bragged in Instagram of luxury living, mansions, two dozen sports cars and Michael Jackson memorabilia, all purloined from Africa’s oil-rich country, as vice president to his president-father.

(15) Gupta, South Africa – The Gupta family amassed $7 billion from monopolies acquired by bribing president Jacob Zuma and children.

(16) Lebanon – In 2015 the country plunged into garbage crisis, filling its streets and beaches with trash, stench and water contamination, with the collapse of the rubbish disposal monopoly acquired through bribery.

(17) FIFA – In 2015 was exposed rampant racketeering and impunity in the Fedération Internationale de Football Association, tarnishing sports overseers.

(18) Myanmar – Environmental disasters kill thousands yearly due to mining by generals, cronies and drug lords; in 2014 alone $31 billion in jade stones were smuggled to China.

(19) Guatemala – A former president resigned due to corruption investigations, but present president Jimmy Morales blocked the probe when he too was linked.

(20) Turkey – President Recep Tayyip Erdogan removed or jailed hundreds of police, prosecutors and judges for investigating the “gas for gold” racket of the ruling Justice and Development Party.

(21) Azerbaijan – Officials bribed European delegates $3 billion to ignore the country’s human rights violations and rigged elections.

(22) Paradise Papers – In 2017 records of Bermuda law firm Appleby leaked secret deposits of 120 politicians, royals, oligarchs and fraudsters, plus bribes from Glencore to Congo president Joseph Kabila.

(23) Operation Lava Jato – Investigation of $1-billion sleaze in Brazil’s oil giant Petrobras exposed dirty money, foreign bribery and illicit political financing.

(24) The Troika – Leaked data from Troika Dialog, once Russia’s largest private investment bank, revealed that half of Russia’s wealth is stashed in offshore tax havens.

(25) Babiš, Czech Republic – In 2019 the European Commission discovered that $19 million in EU agricultural subsidies went to a private company of prime minister Andrej Babiš.

Sinovac safety efficacy and price still need clarifying

Sinovac safety efficacy and price still need clarifying

* * *

Catch “Sapol” radio show, Saturdays, 8-10 a.m., dwIZ (882-AM)

            “Gotcha: An Exposé on the Philippine Government” is available as e-book and paperback. Get a free copy of “Chapter 1: Beijing’s Bullying and Duplicity”. Simply subscribe to my newsletter HERE. Book orders also accepted there.

Sinovac safety efficacy and price still need clarifying

Politicizing of ‘ayuda’ backfires on Duterte

Politicizing of ‘ayuda’ backfires on Duterte

 Wikipedia photos of President Duterte (left) and Manila Mayor Isko Moreno (right)

written on August 13, 2021

 

“A callboy as president?” Rody Duterte sounded so scandalized by bikini photos of a male metropolitan mayor aspiring for the highest office. Duterte didn’t name names. Still he devoted to it a good part of his Ulat sa Bayan telecast last Monday:

“Nakita ko nga sa Facebook kanina. Naka-bikini ang gago. May isang picture pa doon na sinisilip niya ang ari niya. ‘Yan ang gusto ninyo? Parang callboy, naghuhubad, nagpa-picture naka-bikini, tapos ‘yung garter tinatanggal niya… ‘Yan ang training ng presidente? Maghubad, magpa-picture at magsilip… magyabang sa kanilang ari?”

Duterte claimed that the mayor is “so disorganized.” “Ayuda” for the latest pandemic re-lockdown supposedly cannot be entrusted to that city hall. Duterte instead ordered his generals for local governments and social welfare to hand out the cash aid. Those departments have no foot soldiers.

As if on cue, still shots suddenly spread online of Manila Mayor Isko Moreno clad only in briefs. Trolls scrambled to bash the matinee idol-turned-politician. Moreno is of late Duterte’s favorite target for blind-item sniping. Simple remarks of the mayor rile the occupant of Malacañang. As example, “The presidency is not for inheriting” likely pricks Duterte’s emergent scheme for daughter Sara to succeed him in Election 2022. Although Moreno and Sara have yet to declare to run, both are leading in surveys.

Defenders retorted that the photos were two-decades-old promos for a movie when Moreno was a showbiz newbie. That’s past and he has since changed. “What’s important is that [he] never lied, did not steal, kill nor brought shame to the great people of Manila as a public servant,” Cavite Governor Jonvic Remulla told ABS-CBN News.

“Eyes on the ball, not on someone else’s balls,” Bayan Muna Rep. Ferdinand Gaite chided Duterte. “May oras pa siya maghalungkat ng lumang litrato, e nagugutom na ang taumbayan dahil sa kanyang lockdown.” Region-wide lockdowns are Malacañang’s default response to COVID-19 resurges, amidst its paltry vaccinations and contact tracing. Livelihoods are disrupted and families subsisting hand-to-mouth go hungry, as police keep them indoors. Duterte’s “ayuda” was to commence only last Wednesday, five days after he imposed weeks of lockdown.

Drifting into locker-room blabber typifies Duterte’s presidential speeches. Spokesmen blame the public for being scandalized and not getting the joke. In a midterm election campaign rally at Puerto Princesa Coliseum, Palawan, on April 8, 2019, he bragged about his penis size and sexual prowess:

“Sa totoo ang lalaki is measured by his character, hindi ‘yong pa-guwapo-guwapo ka diyan, tapos paglabas ng t***, maliit pala… Pag ako binigyan ng Diyos ng ganyan kaliit, putulin ko ‘yan sa harap ng altar. ‘T*** i*** mo, ‘yan lang pala binigay mo, todohin na natin. E kung sa dormitoryo nakatira ‘yan kagaya namin, sa YMCA, hubad lahat maglakad sa corridor. Walang tapis-tapis. Diyan mo makita pagka umaga. Ako hindi nagyayabang… ang tuwalya ko… pinapatong ko tapos lakad ako sa kanila. Bilib sila. ‘P***-i*** Duterte, ang tigas o!’ May buhay pa ba na taga-YMCA sa Pilipinas? Di ba, pabiliban tayo? Kasi noong bata pa, nakaharap sa langit halos e (demonstrates with the microphones). Pataas. Nakahalik na ‘yung ulo sa pusod ko. Pasalamat ako sa tatay ko – at least pinalabas niya ako sa buhay highly equipped. Bata pa kami noon nang magpunta kami doon sa mga babae. Magtakbuhan. ‘Ayaw namin ‘yang payat na ‘yan – ayaw nang huminto.’ Lugi sila.” (See link below)

Illuminating, inspiring words memorialize statesmen: Churchill, de Gaulle, Roosevelt, Mitterand, Kennedy, etc. Duterte is immortalized in global mainstream and social media for misogynistic remarks in public. Angry netizens have been reposting those.

Campaigning for president in 2016 Duterte said he should have been first as then-Davao City mayor to gang-rape an attractive Australian missionary slain by rioting convicts. In November 2016, the new President said he nudged Cabinet members to join him ogle the knees of Vice President Leni Robredo. In February 2018, he told soldiers to shoot female communist insurgents in the vagina. Another time he said they can rape up to three times with his permission. The following April he narrated how, as a teenager, he had molested the family housemaid. In August 2018 he justified the high rape incidence in his Davao home-city, “As long as there are many beautiful women, there will be more rape cases.” In March of this year, his birthday video showed him attempting to grope a servant. Belittling it, his spokesman claimed there was no malice since the woman was a longtime house helper and was used to Duterte’s naughtiness.

Last Wednesday the Cabinet turned over to Moreno’s office the “ayuda” for his distribution. The generals refused to talk to reporters about Duterte’s directive. There was no reason to withhold the emergency cash. Only last June 30 they had commended Moreno for swift action on similar funds during the April lockdown. The certificate cited Moreno’s “efficient, timely completion of the distribution of ayuda to your constituents despite the challenges of the pandemic, in accordance with the DSWD-DILG-DND Joint Memorandum Circular 1-2021.”

(Listen: https://youtu.be/Ykh1OC8ZPLg)

Sinovac safety efficacy and price still need clarifying

Sinovac safety efficacy and price still need clarifying

* * *

Catch “Sapol” radio show, Saturdays, 8-10 a.m., dwIZ (882-AM)

            “Gotcha: An Exposé on the Philippine Government” is available as e-book and paperback. Get a free copy of “Chapter 1: Beijing’s Bullying and Duplicity”. Simply subscribe to my newsletter HERE. Book orders also accepted there.

Sinovac safety efficacy and price still need clarifying

Site Terms & Conditions (scroll down for the buttons)

This site, jariusbondoc.com, is free for your use.

However, we do have some terms and conditions which you can find below. By continuing to use or to read from this site, that means you understand and agree to comply with the terms and conditions.

I. PRIVACY POLICY

This privacy policy (“policy”) will help you understand how jariusbondoc.com uses and protects the data you provide to us when you visit and use https://jariusbondoc.com/ (“website”, “service”).

We reserve the right to change this policy at any given time. If you want to make sure that you are up to date with the latest changes, we advise you to frequently visit this page.

 

What User Data We Collect

When you visit the website, we may collect the following data:

  • Your IP address
  • Your contact information and email address
  • Other information such as interests and preferences
  • Data profile regarding your online behavior on our website

 

Why We Collect Your Data

We are collecting your data for several reasons:

  • To better understand your needs
  • To improve our services and products
  • To send you promotional emails containing the information we think you will find interesting
  • To contact you to fill out surveys and participate in other types of market research
  • To customize our website according to your online behavior and personal preferences

 

Safeguarding and Securing the Data

jariusbondoc.com is committed to securing your data and keeping it confidential. jariusbondoc.com has done all in its power to prevent data theft, unauthorized access, and disclosure by implementing the latest technologies and software, which help us safeguard all the information we collect online.

 

Our Cookie Policy

Once you agree to allow our website to use cookies, you also agree to use the data it collects regarding your online behavior (analyze web traffic, web pages you spend the most time on, and websites you visit).

The data we collect by using cookies is used to customize our website to your needs. After we use the data for statistical analysis, the data is completely removed from our systems.

Please note that cookies don’t allow us to gain control of your computer in any way. They are strictly used to monitor which pages you find useful and which you do not so that we can provide a better experience for you.

If you want to disable cookies, you can do it by accessing the settings of your internet browser.

 

Links to Other Websites

Our website contains links that lead to other websites. If you click on these links jariusbondoc.com is not held responsible for your data and privacy protection. Visiting those websites is not governed by this privacy policy agreement. Make sure to read the privacy policy documentation of the website you go to from our website.

 

Restricting the Collection of your Personal Data

At some point, you might wish to restrict the use and collection of your personal data. You can achieve this by doing the following:

 

  • When you are filling the forms on the website, make sure to check if there is a box which you can leave unchecked, if you don’t want to disclose your personal information.
  • If you have already agreed to share your information with us, feel free to contact us via email and we will be more than happy to change this for you.

 

jariusbondoc.com will not lease, sell or distribute your personal information to any third parties, unless we have your permission. We might do so if the law forces us. Your personal information will be used when we need to send you promotional materials if you agree to this privacy policy.

 

II. COPYRIGHT NOTICE

All materials contained on this site are protected by the Republic of the Phlippines copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of jariusbondoc.com or in the case of third party materials, the owner of that content. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notice from copies of the content.

However, you may download material from jariusbondoc.com on the Web (one machine readable copy and one print copy per page) for your personal, noncommercial use only.

If you wish to use jariusbondoc.com content for commercial purposes, such as for content syndication etc., please contact us at jariusbondoconline@gmail.com.

Links to Websites other than those owned by jariusbondoc.com are offered as a service to readers. The editorial staff of jariusbondoc.com was not involved in their production and is not responsible for their content.

 

III. TERMS OF SERVICE

 

  1. GENERAL RULES AND DEFINITIONS

 

1.1 If you choose to use the jariusbondoc.com service (the “Service”), you will be agreeing to abide by all of the terms and conditions of this Agreement between you and jariusbondoc.com (“jariusbondoc.com “).

 

1.2 jariusbondoc.com may change, add or remove portions of this Agreement at any time, but if it does so, it will post such changes on the Service, or send them to you via e-mail. It is your responsibility to review this Agreement prior to each use of the Site and by continuing to use this Site, you agree to any changes.

 

1.3 If any of these rules or any future changes are unacceptable to you, you may cancel your membership by sending e-mail to jariusbondoconline.com (see section 10.1 regarding termination of service). Your continued use of the service now, or following the posting of notice of any changes in these operating rules, will indicate acceptance by you of such rules, changes, or modifications.

 

1.4 jariusbondoc.com may change, suspend or discontinue any aspect of the Service at any time, including the availability of any Service feature, database, or content. jariusbondoc.com may also impose limits on certain features and services or restrict your access to parts or all of the Service without notice or liability.

 

  1. JARIUSBONDOC.COM CONTENT AND MEMBER SUBMISSIONS

 

2.1 The contents of the jariusbondoc.com are intended for your personal, noncommercial use. All materials published on jariusbondoc.com (including, but not limited to news articles, photographs, images, illustrations, audio clips and video clips, also known as the “Content”) are protected by copyright, and owned or controlled by jariusbondoc.com or the party credited as the provider of the Content. You shall abide by all additional copyright notices, information, or restrictions contained in any Content accessed through the Service.

 

2.2 The Service and its Contents are protected by copyright pursuant to the Republic of the Philippines and international copyright laws. You may not modify, publish, transmit, participate in the transfer or sale of, reproduce (except as provided in Section 2.3 of this Agreement), create new works from, distribute, perform, display, or in any way exploit, any of the Content or the Service (including software) in whole or in part.

 

2.3 You may download or copy the Content and other downloadable items displayed on the Service for personal use only, provided that you maintain all copyright and other notices contained therein. Copying or storing of any Content for other than personal use is expressly prohibited without prior written permission from jariusbondoc.com or the copyright holder identified in the copyright notice contained in the Content.

 

  1. FORUMS, DISCUSSIONS AND USER GENERATED CONTENT

 

3.1 You shall not upload to, or distribute or otherwise publish on the message boards (the “Feedback Section”) any libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic, abusive, or otherwise illegal material.

 

3.2 (a)Be courteous. You agree that you will not threaten or verbally abuse jariusbondoc.com columnists and other jariusbondoc.com community Members, use defamatory language, or deliberately disrupt discussions with repetitive messages, meaningless messages or “spam.”

 

3.2 (b) Use respectful language. Like any community, the Feedback Sections will flourish only when our Members feel welcome and safe. You agree not to use language that abuses or discriminates on the basis of race, religion, nationality, gender, sexual preference, age, region, disability, etc. Hate speech of any kind is grounds for immediate and permanent suspension of access to all or part of the Service.

 

3.2 (c) Debate, but don’t attack. In a community full of opinions and preferences, people always disagree. jariusbondoc.com encourages active discussions and welcomes heated debate in our Feedback Sections. But personal attacks are a direct violation of this Agreement and are grounds for immediate and permanent suspension of access to all or part of the Service.

 

3.3 The Feedback Sections shall be used only in a noncommercial manner. You shall not, without the express approval of jariusbondoc.com, distribute or otherwise publish any material containing any solicitation of funds, advertising or solicitation for goods or services.

 

3.4 You are solely responsible for the content of your messages. However, while jariusbondoc.com does not and cannot review every message posted by you on the Forums and is not responsible for the content of these messages, jariusbondoc.com reserves the right to delete, move, or edit messages that it, in its sole discretion, deems abusive, defamatory, obscene, in violation of copyright or trademark laws, or otherwise unacceptable.

 

3.5 You acknowledge that any submissions you make to the Service (i.e., user-generated content including but not limited to: text, video, audio and photographs) (each, a “Submission”) may be edited, removed, modified, published, transmitted, and displayed by jariusbondoc.com and you waive any moral rights you may have in having the material altered or changed in a manner not agreeable to you. You grant jariusbondoc.com a perpetual, nonexclusive, world-wide, royalty free, sub-licensable license to the Submissions, which includes without limitation the right for jariusbondoc.com or any third party it designates, to use, copy, transmit, excerpt, publish, distribute, publicly display, publicly perform, create derivative works of, host, index, cache, tag, encode, modify and adapt (including without limitation the right to adapt to streaming, downloading, broadcast, mobile, digital, thumbnail, scanning or other technologies) in any form or media now known or hereinafter developed, any Submission posted by you on or to jariusbondoc.com or any other website owned by it, including any Submission posted on jariusbondoc.com through a third party.

 

3.6 By submitting an entry to jariusbondoc.com’s Readers’ Corner, you are consenting to its display on the site and for related online and offline promotional uses.

 

  1. ACCESS AND AVAILABILITY OF SERVICE AND LINKS

 

4.1 jariusbondoc.com contains links to other related World Wide Web Internet sites, resources, and sponsors of jariusbondoc.com. Since jariusbondoc.com is not responsible for the availability of these outside resources, or their contents, you should direct any concerns regarding any external link to the site administrator or Webmaster of such site.

 

  1. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES

 

5.1 You represent, warrant and covenant (a) that no materials of any kind submitted through your account will (i) violate, plagiarize, or infringe upon the rights of any third party, including copyright, trademark, privacy or other personal or proprietary rights; or (ii) contain libelous or otherwise unlawful material; and (b) that you are at least thirteen years old. You hereby indemnify, defend and hold harmless jariusbondoc.com, and all officers, directors, owners, agents, information providers, affiliates, licensors and licensees (collectively, the “Indemnified Parties”) from and against any and all liability and costs, including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys’ fees, incurred by the Indemnified Parties in connection with any claim arising out of any breach by you or any user of your account of this Agreement or the foregoing representations, warranties and covenants. You shall cooperate as fully as reasonably required in the defense of any such claim. jariusbondoc.com reserves the right, at its own expense, to assume the exclusive defense and control of any matter subject to indemnification by you.

 

5.2 jariusbondoc.com does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any advice, opinion, statement, or other information displayed, uploaded, or distributed through the Service by any user, information provider or any other person or entity. You acknowledge that any reliance upon any such opinion, advice, statement, memorandum, or information shall be at your sole risk. THE SERVICE AND ALL DOWNLOADABLE SOFTWARE ARE DISTRIBUTED ON AN “AS IS” BASIS WITHOUT WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, WARRANTIES OF TITLE OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. YOU HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT USE OF THE SERVICE IS AT YOUR SOLE RISK.

 

  1. COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN JARIUSBONDOC.COM AND MEMBERS

 

6.1 If you indicate on your registration form that you want to receive such information, jariusbondoc.com, its owners and assigns, will allow certain third party vendors to provide you with information about products and services.

 

6.2 jariusbondoc.com reserves the right to send electronic mail to you for the purpose of informing you of changes or additions to the Service.

 

6.3 jariusbondoc.com reserves the right to disclose information about your usage and demographics, provided that it will not reveal your personal identity in connection with the disclosure of such information. Advertisers and/or Licensees on our Web site may collect and share information about you only if you indicate your acceptance. For more information please read the Privacy Policy of jariusbondoc.com.

 

6.4 jariusbondoc.com may contact you via e-mail regarding your participation in user surveys, asking for feedback on the Website and existing or prospective products and services. This information will be used to improve our Website and better understand our users, and any information we obtain in such surveys will not be shared with third parties, except in aggregate form.

 

  1. TERMINATION

 

 

7.1 jariusbondoc.com may, in its sole discretion, terminate or suspend your access to all or part of the Service for any reason, including, without limitation, breach or assignment of this Agreement.

 

  1. MISCELLANEOUS

 

8.1 This Agreement has been made in and shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the Republic of the Philippines law. Any action to enforce this agreement shall be brought in the courts located in Manila, Philippines.

 

8.2 Notwithstanding any of the foregoing, nothing in this Terms of Service will serve to preempt the promises made in jariusbondoc.com Privacy Policy.

 

8.3 Correspondence should be sent to jariusbondoconline.com.

 

8.4 You agree to report any copyright violations of the Terms of Service to jariusbondoc.com as soon as you become aware of them. In the event you have a claim of copyright infringement with respect to material that is contained in the jariusbondoc.com service, please notify jariusbondoconline.com. This Terms of Service was last updated on November 7, 2020.