Select Page

Sign up to abolish political dynasties

Be part of history. Join the People’s Initiative to wipe out political dynasties. Simply sign the draft legislation on d1l.org. Convince others to sign up too.

Dapat Isa Lang is the first ever citizens’ direct enactment. It needs signatures of three percent of voters in each congressional district, and 10 percent nationwide. Comelec will verify the signatures, then set a referendum. If majority vote “yes,” it instantly becomes law.

Advertisement
Politicos will not voluntarily give up power. A hundred dynasties have been enthroned for 150 years. They’ve ignored for 39 years the Constitution’s order to define their limits.

Eighty-one percent of congressmen and 83 percent of senators are dynasts. Their relatives control nearly all provinces, cities, municipalities – even barangays.

“Sila-sila lang” breeds corruption. At local levels, related politicos negate checks and balances. At national levels they collude to award themselves pork barrels in the form of discretionary allocations.

This led to the worst scam – P1.7-trillion substandard and ghost flood controls in the past 10 years. Only last Wednesday dynastic congressmen inserted in the 2027 national budget P116 billion in political ayuda and infrastructure pork.

Enough is enough, 15 Supreme Court justices unanimously ruled recently. Still, the House approved a watered-down bill that would in effect legalize and perpetuate dynasties.

If Congress fast-breaks its passage, then our People’s Initiative can repeal it.

We citizens must write and pass the anti-dynasty law ourselves. Dapat Isa Lang put up the online petition so that we can easily, safely, freely sign.

The draft is in English, Filipino, Bisaya and Ilocano. Condensed here are the 13 salient Sections:

(1) Title: An Act defining and prohibiting political dynasties via regulations and penalties pursuant to Article II, Section 26 of the Constitution.

(2) Declaration of Policy: The State shall guarantee equal access to opportunities for public service and prohibit political dynasties.

(3) Definition: Political dynasty consists of two or more relatives within fourth degree of consanguinity or affinity, full or half blood, natural or adopted, legitimate or illegitimate, including common-law relationship, who simultaneously or successively run for or hold elective office:

National: President, VP, senator, district or party-list representative;

Local: Governor, vice governor, provincial board member, city/municipal mayor, vice mayor, councilor, barangay chairman, councilman.

(4) Prohibition on Simultaneous or Successive Holding of Elective Office: Only one relative may run for national and one for local office within the same province. Metro Manila is deemed as a province. No succession by spouse, partner or relative right after the term.

(5) Resolution of Conflicting Candidacies or Office-Holding: When two or more relatives run, only one may be allowed to sit. Dynasts shall be allowed to resolve the matter among themselves within 15 days. If there’s no agreement, the relative seeking or holding the higher office shall have preference, based on Section 3.

(6) Disqualification Proceedings: Any citizen can file for disqualification of candidacy, for Comelec to resolve. Candidacies include substitute and party-list nominees.

(7) Quo Warranto: Any voter may file for quo warranto against any official prohibited by this Act at any time during such officer’s incumbency.

(8) Effect of Disqualification or Removal: In case of disqualification or removal under this Act, the qualified candidate who obtained the next highest number of votes shall assume office.

(9) The Philippine Statistics Authority and all Local Civil Registrars shall grant Comelec access to birth, marriage, death and adoption records and other documents necessary to show dynastic relation. This is deemed compliant with Section 4 (e) of the Data Privacy Act.

(10) Penal Clause: Any violator of this Act shall be imprisoned for one to six years, and perpetually disqualified from holding public office.

(11) Repealing Clause: Any law, presidential decree or issuance, executive order, rule or regulation, local ordinance or any part thereof, contrary to or inconsistent with the provisions of this Act is hereby repealed, modified or amended accordingly.

(12) Separability Clause: If any provision of this Act is declared unconstitutional or invalid, the remaining unaffected provisions shall remain in full force.

(13) Effectivity: 15 days after publication in at least two newspapers of general circulation following Comelec certification that this Act was approved by majority of votes in the referendum.

Dapat Isa Lang is led by retired SC justice Antonio Carpio, Fr. Roberto Reyes, Attys. Eirene Aguila, Alex Lacson and Alexander Cabrera, Miguel Karlo Abadines and ex-Comelec commissioner Luie Tito Guia.

Sign up here: d1l.org.

* * *

Catch Sapol radio show, Saturdays, 8 to 10 a.m., dwIZ (882-AM).

Follow me on Facebook: https://tinyurl.com/Jarius-Bondoc

With Chinese contributions, Sara possibly broke 3 laws

VP Sara Duterte’s acceptance of P150-million contribution from China in 2019 merits full investigation. It was an election year in which Sara ran and won as Davao city mayor. The Omnibus Election Code punishes soliciting and accepting foreign contributions with one to six years in prison, and permanent ban from suffrage and public office.

Ex-senator Sonny Trillanes exposed last Friday the P150-million dole. Defense Sec. Gilbert Teodoro wants documents turned over to authorities for scrutiny.

The Chinese embassy gave the P150 million not directly to Sara but to the nonprofit she heads. Tapang at Malasakit Alliance for the Philippines is declared in her 2022 and 2023 statements of assets, liabilities and net worth.

No politico would admit to directly accepting foreign money. Allegations of $10-million bribe to sign the National Broadband Network-ZTE deal in Boao, China just before the 2007 election rocked Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo’s presidency.

TMAP lists Sara and Taguig mayor Lani Cayetano, wife of Sen. Alan Cayetano, as trustees/convenors. Also trustees are Sara’s former spokesman and legal counsel Reynold Munsayac and Davao city information officer Jefrey Tupas.

The P150 million was supposedly for “construction of 13 classroom buildings.” Meaning, unit cost of P11.54 million.

Trillanes said TMAP received the donation in 2019 and disbursed the last P8.42 million in 2020. The embassy and TMAP signed the donation in August 2018 in coordination with DepEd-Davao.

In 2019 DPWH built classrooms for P1.2 million to P2.5 million each. If by Angat Buhay Foundation of then-VP Leni Robredo, it was only P850,000.

The Constitution forbids foreign political contributions. Article IX-C, Constitutional Commissions, Section 2 (5) states:

“Financial contributions from foreign governments and their agencies to political parties, organizations, coalitions or candidates related to elections constitute interference in national affairs and, when accepted, shall be an additional ground for the cancellation of their registration with the Commission on Elections, in addition to other penalties that may be prescribed by law.”

Article XI, Accountability of Public Officers, Section 1 also enshrines public office as public trust, and lays the foundation for strict anti-corruption rules.

RA 6713, Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards for Public Officials and Employees, Section 7 (d) prohibits them from soliciting or accepting – directly or indirectly – any gift, gratuity, favor, entertainment, loan or anything of monetary value from any person in connection with official duties or regulated transactions.

RA 3019, Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act, Section 2 (c) penalizes officials for accepting or receiving gifts, presents or benefits from private or foreign entities in connection with official intervention or favor.

Sara launched TMAP on Oct. 23, 2017 at a big bash at Bonifacio Global City, Taguig. Present were then-foreign secretary Alan and wife mayor Lani Cayetano. Also Sara’s brother, present Davao Mayor Sebastian Duterte, then-Ilocos Norte governor-now-senator Imee Marcos and ex-president Joseph Estrada.

TMAP brought together groups and individuals supportive of then-president Rody Duterte. Throughout 2017 Duterte continuously belittled Manila’s arbitral victory against Beijing over the West Philippine Sea. In 2018 he professed love for President Xi Jinping, whom he asked to make the Philippines a Chinese province.

In 2019 – the year of the P150-million contribution – he dismissed as “ordinary maritime accident” the midnight hit-and-run by a Chinese maritime militia steel trawler of an anchored Filipino wooden boat. Twenty-two fishermen were thrown into the cold dark sea off Palawan.

Trillanes bared another P319 million from the “Chinese government and corporations” to Sara’s spouse Manases Carpio’s Cale88 Foods Corp. Cale88 is one of 18 firms that Sara declared in her SALNs. It reportedly trades banana chips.

Cale88 had no sale in 2021 and only P20,000 in 2022, Trillanes added. Sales zoomed to P23.15 million in 2023, then fivefold to P150.76 million in 2024 and P34.55 million in 2025.

Yet in 2024 Cale88 paid BIR only P10,705 income tax, Trillanes noted. It listed no rank-and-file employees and ended the year with P400,294 cash.

Cale88 factory’s electricity bill was only P8,000 a month in 2023. Trillanes said: “Hindi ‘yan pang-factory ng banana chips.”

It had no trade receivables or payables, implying that it bought and sold goods only in cash. “Parang banana-que stall, ’pag bumili ng materials at magbenta, cash.”

Sara’s lawyer Paolo Panelo retorted Saturday: “Trillanes has been peddling exhausted lies since 2016.

“He’s been peddling the same exhausted lies regarding extrajudicial killings, fabricated drug links, imaginary unexplained wealth, baseless corruption allegations and fictional China connections against the Duterte family.

“Because of these repeated, unmasked deceptions, the Filipino people have rightfully and overwhelmingly rejected Trillanes in every subsequent attempt to get elected back into public office.”

* * *

Catch Sapol radio show, Saturdays, 8 to 10 a.m., dwIZ (882-AM)

Follow me on Facebook: https://tinyurl.com/Jarius-Bondoc

Sara calls trial ‘sarswela’ as hard evidence pile up

VP Sara Duterte called her impeachment trial a “sarswela” where proof of her hidden wealth mounted.

House prosecutors rebuked her for her second belittling of the Senate impeachment court. “Sarswela” is Filipino for the zarzuela Saramusical theater of the late 1800s to early 1900s. It’s also metaphor for “theatrics, histrionics.”

The past two weeks’ hearings focused on Sara’s yearly statements of assets, liabilities and net worth, 2007-2025. Those covered her terms as Davao city vice mayor, mayor and VP.

Sara’s SALNs list 18 businesses that she and/or her spouse Manases Carpio incorporated in those years. Senator-judges and congressman-prosecutors noted three possible constitutional and legal breaches:

• Article VII, Executive Department, Section 13 bans the President, VP, Cabinet secretaries, Usecs, Asecs from “holding any other employment … participate in any business or be financially interested in any contract with the government.”

VP Sara was an active board director and even compensation committee member in some of the companies. Those were in General Information Sheets and Audited Financial Statements submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission.

“She did not divest from private business when she became VP in 2022,” said prosecution spokesman Rep. Zia Alonto Adiong.

• Sara’s net worth ballooned 1,280 percent. The P7,150,497 in 2007 rose to P98,656,131.20 in 2025.

This couldn’t have been from business income. The companies’ GIS and AFS submissions showed either meager annual income or losses.

Perusing the documents, Senate President Sherwin Gatchalian noted that the firms did not pay out cash, stock or property dividends. “Hindi pwedeng manggaling sa mga corporations niya ‘yong paglaki ng kanyang net worth. By process of elimination, pwede na nating i-rule out ‘yong corporations,” he said.

Coming hearings will bare Sara’s P4.4-billion bank deposits. The Anti-Money Laundering Council presented those in March to the House committee on justice.

• In her SALNs as VP in 2022 to 2025, Sara claimed to be stockholder of GenCorp Industries Inc. But the firms’ SEC records do not mention her. Listed instead as 55 percent owner is JTC Group.

Senator-judge Erwin Tulfo elicited info that JTC stands for Jaime Tan Cruz, Davao city doctor-businessman. Cruz was special envoy to China of Sara’s father ex-president Rody Duterte.

JTC Group bagged 15 contracts worth P14.32 million from Davao City Hall, Philippine Government Electronic Procurement System records.

Sara’s brother Mayor Sebastian Duterte corrected the figures in his Facebook page and testimony: JTC Group got 19 contracts worth P33,263,161 since he became mayor in 2022.

Sebastian disavowed knowledge of Sara’s interest in GenCorp. He doesn’t pry into her private activities, he said.

He found nothing wrong with GenCorp’s frequent bagging of city hall contracts. He admitted being partner of Jaime Tan Cruz in three businesses, and his brother Rep. Paolo Duterte in one of those.

Sara’s declared ownership of contractor GenCorp is self-incriminatory, said trial lawyer Howard Calleja. The Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act, Section 3, prohibits public officers from:

“(h) Directly or indirectly having financial or pecuniary interest in any business, contract or transaction in connection with which he intervenes or takes part in his official capacity, or in which he is prohibited by the Constitution or by any law from having any interest;

“(i) Directly or indirectly becoming interested, for personal gain, or having a material interest in any transaction or act requiring the approval of a board, panel or group of which he is a member, and which exercises discretion in such approval, even if he votes against the same or does not participate in the action of the board, committee, panel or group.”

In a Sept. 25 press interview, Sara was asked about attending the hearings. “Anong ibig-sabihin Ma’am, manood ako doon sa kanilang sarswela?” she retorted, adding that her lawyers’ attendance signifies her presence in the legal proceedings.

Sara’s “sarswela” remark is contemptuous, said House prosecution private spokesman Benjamin Tolosa Jr.: “Hindi lang ito violation ng sub judice rule. These statements are inflammatory and attack the integrity of the court.”

Prosecution adviser ex-congressman Ace Barbers said Sara’s statement “should not be allowed to pass without scrutiny, particularly since she had previously questioned the proceedings.”

On Sept. 7, the Office of the Vice President posted on Facebook Sara’s video message. She said, among others: “Hawak man ni Marcos ang mga senador, piskal, huwes at mga pulis, napakaraming abogado naman ang tumutulong sa akin upang ipaglaban at mapanalo ang mga kasong ito.”

That day’s hearing exposed the fake identities of payees of P612.5-million confidential funds of the OVP and DepEd.

* * *

Catch Sapol radio show, Saturdays, 8 to 10 a.m., dwIZ (882-AM).

Follow me on Facebook: https://tinyurl.com/Jarius-Bondoc

BSKE postponement: Evil scheme of political dynasts

Corruption starts at the barangay level. Examples:

• Barangay officials extort P200,000 per telco cell site permit. The three telcos told then-president Duterte in July 2020 about the racket. That “fee” could be higher in a crookeder admin.

One exposé was in San Fernando, Pampanga. A barangay chairman told two supervisors of a telco that bribe was normal. In fact, their competitor paid up just months before. The money was purportedly for barangay projects and to blunt opposition to the cell site.

Telcos are under government pressure to erect 60,000 more cell towers than the present 30,000. The P12 billion they must pay barangay councils under the table constrains them.

Net effect: 118 million Filipinos suffer poor telecom signal.

• Barangay councilmen pocket “ayuda” allocations. Most prevalent are in health benefits, Christmas and birthday gifts to the elderly, even disaster emergency relief.

DILG cited a barangay in San Jacinto, Pangasinan. Every household was supposed to receive P5,500 social amelioration. But only half, P2,750, was given to each. Councilmen forced each family head to sign receipt of the whole P5,500.

Instead of 1,000 households receiving P5,500,000, only P2,750,000 was released. Officials stole the P2,750,000 remainder.

The racket was widespread. DILG sued 301 barangay men in Ilocos region-wide.

Petty thievery also occurs in gifts for seniors and disaster victims. Withheld from each bag of goodies, for instance, is a pack of spaghetti noodles or a can of corned beef that recipients signed for. When added up, the loot runs to millions of pesos.

• Village officials also filch benefits from city or municipal halls. One scheme was discovered last month in a barangay in Sta. Ana, Manila. Ten residents who died as far back as 2000 were still “collecting” and “signing for” P500 monthly aid for seniors. Total take was P5,000 a month or P60,000 a year.

City hall received a complaint about two long-dead brothers-in-law. The senior sister of one noticed in the ledger supposed up-to-date payments to the deceased brother. The senior daughter of the other noticed the same.

The barangay chairwoman begged in vain for the two to not complain to city hall. The two could not believe that their chairwoman, who they thought was their friend, could cheat the government using their deceased kin.

That’s the malady of barangay residents. They trust the officials in their 42,010 barangays and 41,995 Sangguniang Kabataan. The dishonest take advantage of such trust – or helplessness – to enrich themselves.

Not all barangay/SK officials are crooked. Yet there are no statistics for saints and sinners. Residents only assume that their smiling neighbor who sits in the council is doing everything for their good.

At the start of Duterte’s admin, 35,356 or 84 percent of barangays were classified as “drug-affected.” Either the officials couldn’t combat or were in cahoots with narco-traffickers. By the end of his term, approximately 10,000 were still drug-infested.

Barangay/SK elections (BSKE) must push through on Nov. 2. Good officials need to be given fresh mandate, bad ones removed and termed-out ones retired.

Congress and Malacañang conspired, however, to thwart the people’s right to vote and be voted upon. Last Friday they postponed the BSKE to three long years. They deprived Filipinos suffrage in their basic communities.

BSKE should’ve been held as far back as December 2025. On pretext of “fixing the term” of barangay/SK officials to four years instead of the old three, Congress and Malacañang rescheduled it to November 2026. Last Friday, on new pretext of “setting the term” to five years, they again delayed BSKE to November 2028.

They contrived shallow reasons for this latest postponement. One was that there’s an “oil crisis due to international war.” Yet the Bangsamoro Autonomous Region for Muslim Mindanao held parliamentary balloting only last Sept. 14.

Another alibi was that Election Day, the first Monday of November 2026, was to fall on the 2nd, All Souls’ Day, when Filipinos traditionally trek to the provinces to visit the graves of their dearly departed. Election turnout might be dismal. Then again, why didn’t any of 318 congressmen and 24 senators and dozens of President’s men, point up the discrepancy?

The real reason is dynastic politics. Dynasts in Congress want to make barangay/SK officials beholden to them by prolonging their terms till November 2028. That way, quid pro quo, extendees will campaign for the dynasts in the May 2028 presidential-congressional-local balloting.

Eighty-one percent of the House of Reps and 83 percent of the Senate are dynasts. On Sept. 8, 211 of 225 congressmen present voted for BSKE delay. On Sept. 14, 13 of 18 senators present did the same. Three of the five Senate dissenters are among the only four who are not dynasts.

Although the SK law forbids politicians’ relatives up to the second degree, barangays are heavily infiltrated by dynasts.

Four election lawyers led by veteran Romy Macalintal are petitioning the Supreme Court to declare the BSKE postponement as unconstitutional. Congress abused its power to decide on barangay tenures, and the President to enforce it.

Only last Aug. 26, 15 SC justices unanimously ruled against any more political dynasties. One hundred fifty years of dynastic reign since the Spanish regime, 39 years under the 1987 Constitution, should be enough. BSKE should be rid of dynastic manipulation.

* * *

Catch Sapol radio show, Saturdays, 8 to 10 a.m., dwIZ (882-AM).

Follow me on Facebook: https://tinyurl.com/Jarius-Bondoc

Veto sought vs election delay / No choice but to hike fares

Veto the postponement of barangay elections. That will spare Bongbong Marcos from presidential embarrassment.

Forty-two-year-long election lawyer Romy Macalintal wrote BBM twice to uphold suffrage. Frequent arbitrary resetting of barangay and Sangguniang Kabataan elections (BSKE) violates the right to vote and be voted upon.

If granted Malacañang audience, Macalintal will explain to BBM the frivolities of the postponement bill:

• The October 2022 BSKE was delayed by a year to October 2023. Still, the Supreme Court ruled that 2023 electees would have served the old three-year term by October 2025.

• Congress then “set the term” to four years, delaying the October 2025 election to November 2026.

• Now Congress wants to “fix the term” to five years, so is again postponing the November 2026 election to Nov. 2028.

• During the Sept. 9 Senate plenary deliberation, Joel Villanueva asked why they said that a four-year term was sufficient but they now want five years. Sponsor Chiz Escudero replied: “Wala pong partikular na pag-aaral sa nagdaang batas na pinasa natin, partikular sa four-year term.”

• Escudero added: “Mula nang tumayo ako para depensahan, i-sponsor ang panukalang ito, wala akong pinapangakong ito na ang huling [postponement].”

• During the Sept. 1 House deliberation, Tony Tinio asked why they are extending the terms to five years right after extending it to four. Sponsor Henry Oaminal replied, “Laws are continuously evolving and we here in Congress continue to do our work, part of which is to consult different stakeholders.”

• Oaminal added: “Since the law was passed, several stakeholders, including grassroots leaders such as barangay and SK officials, expressed to us that a four-year term would be insufficient.” Tinio retorted: “E natural, sino mang elective official kapag tinanong mo, ‘Okay ba kayo i-extend ang term natin?’ Siyempre sasabihin nila, yes.”

• Oaminal stammered that during committee hearings, Comelec officials endorsed the postponement to November 2028 because of “oil crisis and international wars.” Yet all this time, Comelec Chairman George Garcia has been announcing readiness: ballots are printed, and P8 billion has been spent.

• Another Congress alibi to scrap the Nov. 2026 election is that it falls on the 2nd, All Souls Day, when Filipinos traditionally visit their dearly departed at cemeteries. Yet it was Congress that set it for the first Monday of November this year.

• Legislators need barangay/SK officials to campaign for them in the May 2028 congressional-local elections. That’s why they’re extending BSKE to November 2028. Quid pro quo. But the nonpartisan rule for BSKE will be violated.

Legislators couldn’t distinguish “tenure” from “term,” Macalintal alerted BBM: “I am certain you would not want the Office of the President to give legal life to an erroneous law that is patently unconstitutional, vague, defective, and violative of the right of suffrage. Your veto will save the administration from such legislative missteps.”

* * *

The last time government allowed bus and jeepney fare increases was June 2005. Diesel price spiked at that time to P45 per liter. Salaries of bus and jeepney drivers and conductors, and prices of spare parts were much lower then.

Today, 21 years later, diesel rates are more than double at P105 per liter. Wages have increased several times in all regions; it rose another P60 a day just this month in Metro Manila. Inflation has tripled the price of spare parts.

Jeepney drivers and cooperatives are griping. Earnings from a whole day’s “pasada” goes to fuel alone. Nothing left to take home. They can no longer amortize the “modern jeepneys” that government forced them to purchase in lieu of the dirty, noisy traditional ones that ran on reconditioned engines.

Banks that lent money for modern jeepney purchases – especially government-owned DBP and Landbank – are in danger. They will be forced to repossess units that jeepney men can no longer pay for. Those repossessed units will rot from unuse. Nobody will ply routes. Commuters will suffer.

Bus operators are also groaning. To save on fuel, payroll, and spare parts, they alternately field buses only every other day. Micro and small entrepreneurs are most inconvenienced. They cannot simply switch to motorcycles due to rutty and flooded roads.

“Fare hikes are a last resort,” Transport officials said on Tuesday. Yet they have no more funds to subsidize bus and jeepney fuel.

It’s just a matter of time. When fares are hiked, all else will follow: food, water, medicines, clothing, toiletries, school and office supplies, rent, kitchenware, hardware.

* * *

Catch Sapol radio show, Saturdays, 8 to 10 a.m., DWIZ (882-AM).

Follow me on Facebook: https://tinyurl.com/Jarius-Bondoc

Expect Congress to defy SC, thwart anti-dynasty initiative


A hundred political dynasties have ruled for a century. They won’t readily give up lucrative family business.

Of 254 district congressmen, 205 or 81 percent are dynasts. They’ve infiltrated partylists for the marginalized; 32 of 61 partylist reps come from dynasties.

Three congressmen are close kin of the Vice President, who has three more relatives in local office.

The House Speaker has 15 relatives in Congress and Isabela local positions, and two Executive posts. The Majority Leader is the son of the President, who has a senator-sister, three more close kin in the House, and seven others in Ilocos and Leyte local posts.

Among 24 senators are four pairs of siblings. They and six more senators have congressman-spouses, offspring, siblings, or cousins. Five have offspring or siblings in local elective or national appointive posts. One packed his staff with ten relatives. Only four have no kin in government. Eighty-three percent of senators are dynasts.

Dynastic privilege is most visible in pork barrels, which the Supreme Court outlawed in 2013:

• Rep. Paolo Duterte got P51.8 billion in the last three years of father President Rody Duterte’s term, 2020-2022. His Davao City district was the “epicenter of flood control corruption”, the Ombudsman said.

• Ex-Speaker Martin Romualdez got P57.5 billion in the first three years of cousin President Bongbong Marcos’ term, 2023-2025. He masterminded the flood work scam, the Ombudsman added.

• BBM’s son Majority Leader Sandro Marcos got P39.2 billion, Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism reported.

• Speaker Faustino Dy III got P3.8 billion in 2026, more than thrice the P1 billion originally slated for Isabela’s 6th district, PCIJ said. In 2023-2025 then-6th district Rep. Faustino Dy V got P10.7 billion, while 5th district Rep. Faustino Michael Carlos Dy III got P10.5 billion.

• Ex-DPWH Sec. Manuel Bonoan told the Sandiganbayan that he granted P500 million “leadership fund” per senator per year in the 19th Congress, 2022-2025. Senators availed of P13.29 billion in 2024 and P21 billion in 2025; Bong Revilla got P150 million as public works committee chairman.

For 39 years now, Congress hasn’t enacted a law against dynasties. “Grave abuse of discretion,” fifteen SC justices unanimously ruled Aug. 26.

The 1987 Constitution requires in Article II, State Principles, Section 26: “The State shall guarantee equal access to opportunities for public service, and prohibit political dynasties as may be defined by law.”

The SC listed four “relevant considerations” for prohibition, culled from scholarly research:

(1) Up to fourth degree of consanguinity and affinity, including half-blood, adoptive, step, legitimate or illegitimate, and common-law relationships;

(2) Simultaneous and successive offices;

(3) National and local positions including barangays;

(4) Not only within the same province but by region.

The Dy-Marcos bill that the House passed in June is a farce:

• It forbids simultaneous positions only up to the second degree, and allows uncles, aunts, nephews, nieces, cousins, and in-laws.

• It allows political succession by spouses, offspring, parents, siblings, and in-laws, thus skirting term limits so clans can monopolize specific government seats.

• It treats the President, VP, and Senate as national, but the House as local although part of Congress, thus expanding dynasties there. It forbids relatives from running within the same legislative district, yet allows them in different localities or separate government branches.

• It excludes partylists from coverage. During plenary debates, amendments to ban partylist dynasties were rejected, thus creating a backdoor for dynastic expansion.

• It omits appointive positions and deals only with elective ones. It perpetuates the practice of politicos securing influential unelected appointive government positions for family members, further cementing clan grip on state resources and institutional power.

Dy and Marcos said they tailored the bill for supermajority dynasts, or else there won’t be a bill at all. What 267 of 318 or 83.9 percent of congressmen approved was a bill that would perpetuate dynasties.

Congress shouldn’t be let to satisfy the SC ruling with a watered-down measure, said Alyansa ng Nagkakaisang Mamamayan, led by retired generals and colonels:

“A law that merely regulates dynasties, allows relatives to alternate in office, or legitimizes a family’s continued control of government positions would betray the Constitution’s true intention. Such a measure could strengthen political dynasties instead of dismantling them.”

Seventy percent of Filipinos want dynasties banned, Pulse Asia polled in March. Dynasts stunt economic growth, control local businesses, and withhold permits from rivals. Even scholarships and healthcare depend on dynasts’ endorsement, lamented Atty. Eirene Aguila of Dapat Isa Lang: “They keep people poor and reliant on dole outs.”

The People’s Initiative must gather ten million voters’ signatures – three percent per legislative district and 12 percent nationwide. Comelec, chaired by BBM’s former election lawyer, must validate the signatures. Dynastic Congress must allot billions for a ratificatory plebiscite.

Dynasts can employ guns, goons, and gold to sabotage the process.

* * *

Catch Sapol radio show, Saturdays, 8 to 10 a.m., dWIZ (882-AM).

Follow me on Facebook: https://tinyurl.com/Jarius-Bondoc

Site Terms & Conditions (scroll down for the buttons)

This site, jariusbondoc.com, is free for your use.

However, we do have some terms and conditions which you can find below. By continuing to use or to read from this site, that means you understand and agree to comply with the terms and conditions.

I. PRIVACY POLICY

This privacy policy (“policy”) will help you understand how jariusbondoc.com uses and protects the data you provide to us when you visit and use https://jariusbondoc.com/ (“website”, “service”).

We reserve the right to change this policy at any given time. If you want to make sure that you are up to date with the latest changes, we advise you to frequently visit this page.

 

What User Data We Collect

When you visit the website, we may collect the following data:

  • Your IP address
  • Your contact information and email address
  • Other information such as interests and preferences
  • Data profile regarding your online behavior on our website

 

Why We Collect Your Data

We are collecting your data for several reasons:

  • To better understand your needs
  • To improve our services and products
  • To send you promotional emails containing the information we think you will find interesting
  • To contact you to fill out surveys and participate in other types of market research
  • To customize our website according to your online behavior and personal preferences

 

Safeguarding and Securing the Data

jariusbondoc.com is committed to securing your data and keeping it confidential. jariusbondoc.com has done all in its power to prevent data theft, unauthorized access, and disclosure by implementing the latest technologies and software, which help us safeguard all the information we collect online.

 

Our Cookie Policy

Once you agree to allow our website to use cookies, you also agree to use the data it collects regarding your online behavior (analyze web traffic, web pages you spend the most time on, and websites you visit).

The data we collect by using cookies is used to customize our website to your needs. After we use the data for statistical analysis, the data is completely removed from our systems.

Please note that cookies don’t allow us to gain control of your computer in any way. They are strictly used to monitor which pages you find useful and which you do not so that we can provide a better experience for you.

If you want to disable cookies, you can do it by accessing the settings of your internet browser.

 

Links to Other Websites

Our website contains links that lead to other websites. If you click on these links jariusbondoc.com is not held responsible for your data and privacy protection. Visiting those websites is not governed by this privacy policy agreement. Make sure to read the privacy policy documentation of the website you go to from our website.

 

Restricting the Collection of your Personal Data

At some point, you might wish to restrict the use and collection of your personal data. You can achieve this by doing the following:

 

  • When you are filling the forms on the website, make sure to check if there is a box which you can leave unchecked, if you don’t want to disclose your personal information.
  • If you have already agreed to share your information with us, feel free to contact us via email and we will be more than happy to change this for you.

 

jariusbondoc.com will not lease, sell or distribute your personal information to any third parties, unless we have your permission. We might do so if the law forces us. Your personal information will be used when we need to send you promotional materials if you agree to this privacy policy.

 

II. COPYRIGHT NOTICE

All materials contained on this site are protected by the Republic of the Phlippines copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of jariusbondoc.com or in the case of third party materials, the owner of that content. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notice from copies of the content.

However, you may download material from jariusbondoc.com on the Web (one machine readable copy and one print copy per page) for your personal, noncommercial use only.

If you wish to use jariusbondoc.com content for commercial purposes, such as for content syndication etc., please contact us at jariusbondoconline@gmail.com.

Links to Websites other than those owned by jariusbondoc.com are offered as a service to readers. The editorial staff of jariusbondoc.com was not involved in their production and is not responsible for their content.

 

III. TERMS OF SERVICE

 

  1. GENERAL RULES AND DEFINITIONS

 

1.1 If you choose to use the jariusbondoc.com service (the “Service”), you will be agreeing to abide by all of the terms and conditions of this Agreement between you and jariusbondoc.com (“jariusbondoc.com “).

 

1.2 jariusbondoc.com may change, add or remove portions of this Agreement at any time, but if it does so, it will post such changes on the Service, or send them to you via e-mail. It is your responsibility to review this Agreement prior to each use of the Site and by continuing to use this Site, you agree to any changes.

 

1.3 If any of these rules or any future changes are unacceptable to you, you may cancel your membership by sending e-mail to jariusbondoconline.com (see section 10.1 regarding termination of service). Your continued use of the service now, or following the posting of notice of any changes in these operating rules, will indicate acceptance by you of such rules, changes, or modifications.

 

1.4 jariusbondoc.com may change, suspend or discontinue any aspect of the Service at any time, including the availability of any Service feature, database, or content. jariusbondoc.com may also impose limits on certain features and services or restrict your access to parts or all of the Service without notice or liability.

 

  1. JARIUSBONDOC.COM CONTENT AND MEMBER SUBMISSIONS

 

2.1 The contents of the jariusbondoc.com are intended for your personal, noncommercial use. All materials published on jariusbondoc.com (including, but not limited to news articles, photographs, images, illustrations, audio clips and video clips, also known as the “Content”) are protected by copyright, and owned or controlled by jariusbondoc.com or the party credited as the provider of the Content. You shall abide by all additional copyright notices, information, or restrictions contained in any Content accessed through the Service.

 

2.2 The Service and its Contents are protected by copyright pursuant to the Republic of the Philippines and international copyright laws. You may not modify, publish, transmit, participate in the transfer or sale of, reproduce (except as provided in Section 2.3 of this Agreement), create new works from, distribute, perform, display, or in any way exploit, any of the Content or the Service (including software) in whole or in part.

 

2.3 You may download or copy the Content and other downloadable items displayed on the Service for personal use only, provided that you maintain all copyright and other notices contained therein. Copying or storing of any Content for other than personal use is expressly prohibited without prior written permission from jariusbondoc.com or the copyright holder identified in the copyright notice contained in the Content.

 

  1. FORUMS, DISCUSSIONS AND USER GENERATED CONTENT

 

3.1 You shall not upload to, or distribute or otherwise publish on the message boards (the “Feedback Section”) any libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic, abusive, or otherwise illegal material.

 

3.2 (a)Be courteous. You agree that you will not threaten or verbally abuse jariusbondoc.com columnists and other jariusbondoc.com community Members, use defamatory language, or deliberately disrupt discussions with repetitive messages, meaningless messages or “spam.”

 

3.2 (b) Use respectful language. Like any community, the Feedback Sections will flourish only when our Members feel welcome and safe. You agree not to use language that abuses or discriminates on the basis of race, religion, nationality, gender, sexual preference, age, region, disability, etc. Hate speech of any kind is grounds for immediate and permanent suspension of access to all or part of the Service.

 

3.2 (c) Debate, but don’t attack. In a community full of opinions and preferences, people always disagree. jariusbondoc.com encourages active discussions and welcomes heated debate in our Feedback Sections. But personal attacks are a direct violation of this Agreement and are grounds for immediate and permanent suspension of access to all or part of the Service.

 

3.3 The Feedback Sections shall be used only in a noncommercial manner. You shall not, without the express approval of jariusbondoc.com, distribute or otherwise publish any material containing any solicitation of funds, advertising or solicitation for goods or services.

 

3.4 You are solely responsible for the content of your messages. However, while jariusbondoc.com does not and cannot review every message posted by you on the Forums and is not responsible for the content of these messages, jariusbondoc.com reserves the right to delete, move, or edit messages that it, in its sole discretion, deems abusive, defamatory, obscene, in violation of copyright or trademark laws, or otherwise unacceptable.

 

3.5 You acknowledge that any submissions you make to the Service (i.e., user-generated content including but not limited to: text, video, audio and photographs) (each, a “Submission”) may be edited, removed, modified, published, transmitted, and displayed by jariusbondoc.com and you waive any moral rights you may have in having the material altered or changed in a manner not agreeable to you. You grant jariusbondoc.com a perpetual, nonexclusive, world-wide, royalty free, sub-licensable license to the Submissions, which includes without limitation the right for jariusbondoc.com or any third party it designates, to use, copy, transmit, excerpt, publish, distribute, publicly display, publicly perform, create derivative works of, host, index, cache, tag, encode, modify and adapt (including without limitation the right to adapt to streaming, downloading, broadcast, mobile, digital, thumbnail, scanning or other technologies) in any form or media now known or hereinafter developed, any Submission posted by you on or to jariusbondoc.com or any other website owned by it, including any Submission posted on jariusbondoc.com through a third party.

 

3.6 By submitting an entry to jariusbondoc.com’s Readers’ Corner, you are consenting to its display on the site and for related online and offline promotional uses.

 

  1. ACCESS AND AVAILABILITY OF SERVICE AND LINKS

 

4.1 jariusbondoc.com contains links to other related World Wide Web Internet sites, resources, and sponsors of jariusbondoc.com. Since jariusbondoc.com is not responsible for the availability of these outside resources, or their contents, you should direct any concerns regarding any external link to the site administrator or Webmaster of such site.

 

  1. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES

 

5.1 You represent, warrant and covenant (a) that no materials of any kind submitted through your account will (i) violate, plagiarize, or infringe upon the rights of any third party, including copyright, trademark, privacy or other personal or proprietary rights; or (ii) contain libelous or otherwise unlawful material; and (b) that you are at least thirteen years old. You hereby indemnify, defend and hold harmless jariusbondoc.com, and all officers, directors, owners, agents, information providers, affiliates, licensors and licensees (collectively, the “Indemnified Parties”) from and against any and all liability and costs, including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys’ fees, incurred by the Indemnified Parties in connection with any claim arising out of any breach by you or any user of your account of this Agreement or the foregoing representations, warranties and covenants. You shall cooperate as fully as reasonably required in the defense of any such claim. jariusbondoc.com reserves the right, at its own expense, to assume the exclusive defense and control of any matter subject to indemnification by you.

 

5.2 jariusbondoc.com does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any advice, opinion, statement, or other information displayed, uploaded, or distributed through the Service by any user, information provider or any other person or entity. You acknowledge that any reliance upon any such opinion, advice, statement, memorandum, or information shall be at your sole risk. THE SERVICE AND ALL DOWNLOADABLE SOFTWARE ARE DISTRIBUTED ON AN “AS IS” BASIS WITHOUT WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, WARRANTIES OF TITLE OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. YOU HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT USE OF THE SERVICE IS AT YOUR SOLE RISK.

 

  1. COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN JARIUSBONDOC.COM AND MEMBERS

 

6.1 If you indicate on your registration form that you want to receive such information, jariusbondoc.com, its owners and assigns, will allow certain third party vendors to provide you with information about products and services.

 

6.2 jariusbondoc.com reserves the right to send electronic mail to you for the purpose of informing you of changes or additions to the Service.

 

6.3 jariusbondoc.com reserves the right to disclose information about your usage and demographics, provided that it will not reveal your personal identity in connection with the disclosure of such information. Advertisers and/or Licensees on our Web site may collect and share information about you only if you indicate your acceptance. For more information please read the Privacy Policy of jariusbondoc.com.

 

6.4 jariusbondoc.com may contact you via e-mail regarding your participation in user surveys, asking for feedback on the Website and existing or prospective products and services. This information will be used to improve our Website and better understand our users, and any information we obtain in such surveys will not be shared with third parties, except in aggregate form.

 

  1. TERMINATION

 

 

7.1 jariusbondoc.com may, in its sole discretion, terminate or suspend your access to all or part of the Service for any reason, including, without limitation, breach or assignment of this Agreement.

 

  1. MISCELLANEOUS

 

8.1 This Agreement has been made in and shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the Republic of the Philippines law. Any action to enforce this agreement shall be brought in the courts located in Manila, Philippines.

 

8.2 Notwithstanding any of the foregoing, nothing in this Terms of Service will serve to preempt the promises made in jariusbondoc.com Privacy Policy.

 

8.3 Correspondence should be sent to jariusbondoconline.com.

 

8.4 You agree to report any copyright violations of the Terms of Service to jariusbondoc.com as soon as you become aware of them. In the event you have a claim of copyright infringement with respect to material that is contained in the jariusbondoc.com service, please notify jariusbondoconline.com. This Terms of Service was last updated on November 7, 2020.