Select Page

Sara’s finance officers can go to jail ahead

Gina Acosta/Senate Screengrab

VP Sara Duterte publicly declared to be atheist. At a press conference, Oct. 22, 2024, she said: “Hindi ko aatakihin ‘yung tao, bakit ko aatakihin? Eh ‘yung paniniwala ko, hindi naman niya paniniwala. Parang Diyos lang ‘yan. Naniniwala ka sa Diyos, ako hindi, respetuhin mo ako. Kahit ‘di ako naniniwala, ikaw na naniniwala sa Diyos, rerespetuhin pa rin kita.”

How does that reconcile with the Constitution she swore to defend? The Preamble opens with, “We, the sovereign Filipino people, imploring the aid of Almighty God….”

How does that align with her oaths of office as VP, mayor, vice mayor, which end with, “So help me God.”

“So help me God” also punctuates VP Sara’s oath as a lawyer. Also all her attestations of the truth in Articles of Incorporation, affidavits and as witness.

The Bible warns against godless leaders. Exodus 5:2 narrates: “But Pharaoh said, ‘Who is the Lord, that I should obey him and let Israel go? I do not know the Lord and I will not let Israel go’.”

Proverbs 14:34 warns, “God-devotion makes a country strong; God-avoidance leaves people weak.”

The Hebrew Tanakh contains those same passages.

The Quran similarly teaches those. Surah Al-Qasas 28:38, “And Pharaoh said, ‘O eminent ones, I have not known for you any god other than me.…”

Surah Al-A’raf 7:96, “And if the people of the towns had believed and feared Allah, we would certainly have opened for them blessings from the heaven and the earth.”

* * *

“Alam niyo po ba, Ms. Gina Acosta, na ikaw ang maaring makulong?”Impeachment prosecution lawyer Amando Virgil Ligutan made that remark due to the OVP special disbursing officer’s repeated canned answers during direct examination.

It goes as well for OVP admin and finance ASec Lemuel Ortonio. Ortonio and Acosta acknowledged that their boss, impeached VP Sara Duterte, is the head of agency. They admitted turning over P500 million, on Sara’s say-so, to outsider Col. Raymund Lachica.

That’s despite the absence of a signed receipt by Lachica and in violation of COA Joint Circular No. 2015-01.

The COA joint circular has the force of law because signed with various agencies, says former Philippine Bar Association president Rico Domingo. It holds heads of agencies, finance and disbursing officers responsible for handling confidential and intelligence funds.

Section 8, Administrative Provisions/Penal sanctions, states: “Failure to liquidate any public funds for which one is accountable, upon demand by any duly authorized officer, shall be prima facie evidence that he has put such missing funds or property to personal use and benefit.”

Three charges can be filed against Sara, Acosta and Ortonio:

• Malversation of public funds or property, non-bailable and punishable with life imprisonment due to the huge amount;

• Corruption – “Persuading, inducing or influencing another public officer to perform an act constituting a violation of rules and regulations duly promulgated by competent authority or an offense in connection with the official duties of the latter, or allowing himself to be persuaded, induced or influenced to commit such violation or offense;”

• Plunder, because of three elements: combination or series of crimes, amount exceeding P50 million and personal benefit.

The ombudsman on its own or any citizen can file complaints.

The VP is not immune from suit. More so her blindly loyal subordinates, as Senator-judges Raffy and Erwin Tulfo called Acosta and Ortonio.

Sara and Acosta can be investigated as well for any misuse of Davao City’s confidential funds, P460 million a year in 2019-2022. Sara as mayor and Acosta as disbursing officer handled the P1.84-billion total.

Note that the Department of Justice has indicted Sara before a Quezon City court for grave threats against President Bongbong Marcos, First Lady Liza Araneta and former speaker Martin Romualdez. Sara committed the offense in November 2024, but was charged only this month. She wants the raps dropped for being an impeachable officer.

Trial of Acosta and Ortonio for malversation, corruption and plunder can proceed at once at the Sandiganbayan. That of Sara can be postponed till after her impeachment trial or end of term, says law professor Howard Calleja.

Note again that former senator Bong Revilla was acquitted of plunder in December 2018. But his chief of staff lawyer Richard Cambe took the rap and was convicted and sentenced to reclusion perpetua or up to 40 years in prison. He died of stroke in April 2021 while serving his sentence.

* * *

Catch Sapol radio show, Saturdays, 8 to 10 a.m., dwIZ (882-AM).

Follow me on Facebook: https://tinyurl.com/Jarius-Bondoc

For BBM’s info: SC declared Marcos wealth ill-gotten

PNA Photo

President Bongbong Marcos claimed that his family’s excessive wealth was not ill-gotten, saying that they’ve won some civil suits. He mentioned this to the Foreign Correspondents Association of the Philippines, Aug. 14th, when asked about the status of his family’s overdue estate tax payments.

“The reason we won those civil cases is because they were proven to be not ill-gotten wealth,” he said. Presidential work has been making him neglect his duties as Marcos estate administrator, he added. He’s leaving everything up to lawyers, so supposedly knows nothing about unpaid dues to the government.

The Supreme Court in 1997 ordered the family of the late dictator Ferdinand Marcos Sr. to pay P23 billion estate tax. The ruling became final and executory in 1999.

No payment was made. The tax due has ballooned to P204 billion from penalties, surcharges, and interests. Retired SC senior associate justice Antonio Carpio mentioned this during the 2022 presidential campaign.

The Marcos wealth is illegal. Two SC rulings say so:

• The Presidential Commission on Good Government got Switzerland to release $658 million in secret Swiss bank accounts of Marcos Sr. and First Lady Imelda Romualdez Marcos. The SC in 2003 forfeited the money in favor of the government. It ruled that the Marcos couple’s legal income from 1965 to 1985 was roughly $304,372. Anything vastly above that amount was ill-gotten.

• Also forfeited for the government in 2012 was $40 million from Arelma Corp. The front company was founded as Arelma S.A. in Panama. Marcos used the alias William Saunders to open a Swiss bank account on Mar. 20th, 1968, his third year as President. The next day Imelda opened her own account under alias Jane Ryan. Arelma’s initial $2 million grew to $40 million by the 2010s.

PCGG filed other forfeiture cases for real estate properties discovered in the Philippines. The Office of the Solicitor General prosecuted the cases. Some were dismissed due to procedural shortcomings and insufficient evidence.
The biggest loss was in 2023. The SC affirmed the Sandiganbayan’s dismissal of a P1.05-billion civil forfeiture case involving Imelda and associates. PCGG failed to prove its case by preponderance of evidence.

The SC considered Imelda’s jewelry as part of unlawful holdings because in excess of her income as Human Settlements Minister and Metro Manila governor in 1976-1986. Three sets were confiscated, now kept at the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas:

• Left behind when they fled Malacañang in Feb. 1986 were 400 pieces of gems valued in 2017 at $110,055-$153,089. Those were well-set semi-precious stones made into belts, brooches, and earrings; white diamonds in gold tiaras; pink diamonds in gold bracelets; and diamond in gold buckle. Those were found among 15 mink coats, 508 couture gowns, 888 handbags, and 3,000 pairs of designer shoes.

• Of greater value was the collection Imelda attempted to bring along to Hawaii exile. US Customs took a month to document the $5 million-$10 million hoard. In 1991 Imelda surrendered the “Hawaii collection” in exchange for the dropping of certain lawsuits.

• A third collection was seized from Imelda’s Greek hairdresser Demetriou Roumeliotes who attempted to sneak it out of the Manila airport in Mar. 1986. Consisting of only 60 pieces, it was deemed the most valuable at $3.8 million-$5.3 million. Part of the “Roumeliotes collection” is a diamond-studded bracelet with a 31-carat centerpiece.

Imelda allegedly bought paintings and other artwork, including European masterpieces, each worth millions of dollars. Victims of martial law filed for confiscation by the New York Supreme Court of 206 items. This was for partial fulfillment of their $2-billion award by the Honolulu court in 1995. Those included paintings by Bacon, Cezanne, Degas, El Greco, Filippo Lippi, Gauguin, Goya, Latour, Manet, Matisse, Monet, Picasso, Raphael, Renoir, Tiepolo, Van Gogh.

In 2010 Imelda’s secretary Vilma Bautista illegally sold from the collection Claude Monet’s 1899 painting “Water Lilies” to a London gallery. Price: $32 million to pay off personal debts. It was without Imelda’s consent. Convicted in New York of conspiracy and tax fraud, Bautista was sentenced in Jan. 2014 to two to six years in prison. The Swiss buyer avoided litigation by paying $10 million more to the Marcos victims.

* * *

Catch Sapol radio show, Saturdays, 8 to 10 a.m., dwIZ (882-AM).

Follow me on Facebook: https://tinyurl.com/Jarius-Bondoc

Blame our officials for floods, garbage

Photo from DPWH/Facebook

President Bongbong Marcos thinks we’re all litterbugs. He asks why we can’t be like Japanese youngsters who pocket candy wrappers till they get home to put in waste bins.

Actually many of us Filipinos are neatniks. We do bring home trash for proper disposal. We segregate and compost.
But what happens after that? The government louses up garbage collection.

Observe those garbage collectors – government hirelings. They unload our trash bins onto open stinking trucks. They tear open the garbage bags and mix together what we carefully segregated: plastics, paper, cardboards. They even accept careless neighbors’ kitchen waste and rotten food which should’ve been shredded and flushed onto home septic tanks.

Worse follows thereafter. Rubbish trucks speed on highways, stench and flying scraps and all. Everything’s dumped onto open sites, bulldozed, and let to pile up dozens of feet high.

Officials never learned from the Payatas-Quezon City dump disaster of July 2000. Consecutive typhoons caused the unstable pile of trash 130 feet high – 13 building floors – to collapse, killing 300 scavengers and shanty residents, and leaving 300 more missing.

It happened again in Baguio city in Aug. 2011. The decommissioned Irisan dump collapsed onto homes along Asin Road below, killing six and destroying scores of dwellings.

And twice more this year. Jan. 8th: Cebu city’s Binaliw landfill caved in, killing 36 workers, injuring 18, and dozens missing. Feb. 20th: Rodriguez, Rizal landfill gave way, from which only one scavenger’s body was retrieved, although eyewitnesses said as many as 50 were trapped underneath tons of garbage.

Not to forget, a month-long fire raged last April in Navotas Sanitary Landfill, spreading noxious fumes in Metro Manila and Bulacan, in breach of the 1999 Clean Air Act.

On Aug. 10th-14th monsoon rains and high tide pushed 750 tons of garbage – 200 truckloads – onto Redemptorist Water Channel in Baclaran, Parañaque.

The artificial white sand beach along Manila’s famed sunset boulevard also caused floods in the capital. The dolomite sand regularly accumulates massive amounts of drifting trash, clogging up drains.

That dolomite beach is the fault of Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources. It ignored findings that dolomite dust harms the eyes, lungs, and skin. It didn’t study the environmental impact of the fake beachfront on Manila Bay. It paid a contractor P654 million to extract and pulverize dolomite rocks from seaside Alcoy, Cebu. Its Mines and Geosciences Bureau issued ore transport permits without requisite Alcoy municipal permit and public consultation.

Yet President Rody Duterte on Aug. 26th, 2021 praised the monstrosity: “Dolomite is beautiful to the eyes.”
That encapsulated the issue of floods, garbage, and environmental ruin. Politicos and bureaucrats allowed it.
Five years later last Aug. 12th BBM contrasted Filipinos with Japanese kids. National and local politicos and bureaucrats mimicked him, blaming floods and garbage on us citizens.

They must reread the Ecological Solid Waste Management Act of 2000. Salient features of that R.A. 9003:

• Purpose: Manage solid waste, prioritize waste reduction, protect public health and nature;

• Key provisions: Segregation at source, that is, households, institutions, and commercial establishments must separate garbage into biodegradable, recyclable, non-recyclable/residual and special hazardous waste; 3Rs approach or reduce, reuse, recycle; focus on minimizing waste, composting organic materials; barangays or clusters of them must build materials recovery facilities for sorting;

• Local governments tasked with direct collection, sorting, and structural execution of solid waste programs, including formulating a mandatory 10-year local waste management plan;

• National Solid Waste Management Commission to oversee programs, set guidelines, and unify local strategies;

• NSWMC to be chaired by DENR Sec. (presently Juan Miguel Cuna, with vice chairman Crispian Lao and executive director Maria Delia Valdez).

Sixteen prohibited acts, including:

• Littering, throwing waste matters (including pet poo) in public places such as roads, sidewalks, canals, esteros or parks, and establishments, or causing or permitting the same;

• Undertaking activities or operating, collecting or transporting equipment in violation of sanitation operation and other requirements or permits, P300-P1,000 fine or 1-15 days community service;

• Unsanitary collecting and trucking; open burning of solid waste; causing or permitting the collection of non-segregated or unsorted wastes; take note: city/municipal mayors and barangay officials;

• Squatting in open dumps and landfills; open dumping, burying of biodegradable or nonbiodegradable materials in flood prone areas, P1,000-P3,000 or one-half to six months imprisonment;

• Mixing of source-separated recyclable materials with other solid waste in any vehicle, box, container or receptacle used in solid waste collection; improper operation of open dumps; manufacture, distribution, or use of non-environmentally acceptable packaging materials, P500,000;

• Importing toxic wastes misrepresented as “recyclable” or “with recyclable content”, P10,000-P200,000, plus imprisonment of 30 days to three years;

• Constructing any establishment within 200 meters from open dumps, controlled dumps, or sanitary landfill; and constructing or operating landfills or any waste disposal facility on any aquifer, groundwater reservoir, or watershed area and or any portions thereof, P100,000-P1 million, plus one to six years in prison.
In Dec. 2008 the Supreme Court ordered national and local officials to keep Manila Bay clean. The 1977 Environment Code or PD 1152 obligates them to do so.

Covered agencies: DENR, DILG, PNP Maritime Group, Coast Guard, DBM, DepEd, DOH, DA, DPWH, MWSS, LWUA, PPA, MMDA.
Local governments: Bataan, Pampanga, Bulacan, Tarlac, Cavite, Laguna, Rizal, and 17 Metro Manila cities.
Officials, politicos, and bureaucrats must also beware. We Filipinos want them to answer for the P1.7-trillion flood control scam, 2016-present, which killed family members and destroyed our homes, farms, orchards, shops, vehicles, furniture, clothes, even memorabilia.

* * *

Catch Sapol radio show, Saturdays, 8 to 10 a.m., dwIZ (882-AM).

Follow me on Facebook: https://tinyurl.com/Jarius-Bondoc

32 ghost projects, 32 dormant committees blamed on Cayetano

Photo from DPWH/Facebook

Senate Minority Leader Alan Cayetano is being blamed for 32 ghost public works. He is also being blamed for the dormancy of 32 Senate committees.

The two issues are joined.

The 32 fake flood works are in Cayetano’s Taguig home city. All are labeled “slope protection and mitigation”, Majority Senator Panfilo Lacson said. Some are for around P100 million each, totaling P2.385 billion from Cayetano’s P6.79-billion insertion in the 2025 national budget.

“Bulacan is the microcosm of flood project anomalies. Taguig is something else – employing old and new tricks, passing off illegal reclamations as slope protection, ghost projects, double appropriations, recycled photos from past completed contracts to bill and collect for new ones – all controlled by one person, dating as far back as 2019,” Lacson posted on X.

Cayetano took offense, saying that phantom works worsened floods in Bulacan, while there’s none in Taguig.
Lacson alleged plunder, malversation, graft and corruption. “We turned over to the Office of the Ombudsman for their further evaluation and motu proprio investigation all documentary and testimonial evidence, official records from government websites, while others were supplied by reliable sources. From 2020-2025 Taguig accumulated P14.4B worth of infra projects and still counting.”

Among the contracts are P94-million flood control in Barangay Lower Bicutan, P49.9-million multipurpose building at the Lakeshore Complex reclamation, P94-million Laguna Lakeshore improvement, and two rehab works each worth P141.8 million at Phases 4 and 5.

Lacson avoided linking Cayetano’s wife Laarni who is on her fifth term as Taguig mayor, 2025-2028. She was four-time mayor in 2010-2019 and 2022-2025.

Cayetano’s estranged brother Lino tipped off Lacson about other details. Lino was Taguig congressman in 2013-2016 and mayor in 2019-2022. He now chairs government-owned People’s Television Network.

Taguig proceeded with reclamation on its own and sold segments to private buyers without Philippine Reclamation Authority consent. PRA is to seize large portions of the Laguna de Bay reclamation, Lacson told DZBB Sunday.

Last Tuesday, Cayetano did not attend the Senate impeachment hearing in the morning and plenary in the afternoon.
Majority Senator Raffy Tulfo complained about inability to convene three committees that he chairs – Environment, Migrant Workers, Public Services. He said that’s because Cayetano refuses to nominate Minority senators as members.

Angry words were exchanged with Alan’s sister Minority Senator Pia Cayetano. She said Tulfo should have approached her to inquire about the committee memberships instead of resorting to dramatics. She added that Alan wasn’t there because feeling under the weather.

The previous day Alan had said on a Facebook video that he showered in the cold rain Sunday. Though absent from the Senate on Tuesday he broadcast from home on Facebook about “purpose in politics and in faith”.

Senate President Sherwin Gatchalian confirmed that 32 of 41 standing committees have been sleeping because of no members from the Minority.

Among these committees are the powerful Blue Ribbon which investigates graft and corruption, and Foreign Affairs which is the sole purview of the Senate.

Also Education, Health, Science and Technology, Public Works, Defense, Agriculture, and Transportation which are to receive bulk of the 2027 national budget.

Committee hearings scrutinize budget details before submission to the plenary.

As far back as June 3rd Raffy’s brother Majority Senator Erwin Tulfo complained that he too couldn’t convene the Blue Ribbon Committee that he chairs. Cayetano allegedly was delaying to nominate four Minority senators as members. Yet the Minority was heckling Tulfo for supposed refusal to continue investigating the P1.7-trillion flood works scandal.

On July 29th Lacson posted on X: “The public may partake of the ‘delicious’ part if they watch the Blue Ribbon Committee hearings – details of the truth behind the 5 Taguig case studies we submitted to the Ombudsman.”

Yet the previous day Erwin accused the Minority of attempting to prevent the Blue Ribbon from proceeding with the probe.

Asked who from the Minority was seeking to stop the hearing, Erwin avoided naming names but said, “Obvious. Who is being investigated? Who is Senator Lacson targeting?”

Cayetano was Senate President from May 11th to June 3rd – 23 working days. For five days thereafter he boycotted the plenary while broadcasting daily on Facebook to forestall his ouster.

Cayetano reappeared at the Senate with unkempt beard and mustache.

On July 20th Erwin told podcaster Christian Esguerra: “I think he started this actuation nu’ng matanggal siya as Senate President. Nag-iba ang takbo ng isip ni Senator Alan. Kaya nga ipinagdadasal ko na lang na sana bumalik pa sa katinuan.

“Tignan mo pati ang postura niya. Hindi na nag-aahit. Hindi mo na maintindihan. Parang taong-grasa na. ‘Yong porma niya, pati ‘yong mga pananalita niya, parang out of the blue biglang mag-snap na lang ng ganun.”

* * *

Catch Sapol radio show, Saturdays, 8 to 10 a.m., dwIZ (882-AM).

Follow me on Facebook: https://tinyurl.com/Jarius-Bondoc

What raps to file vs Leviste, Paras

PNA Photo

“Is there such crime as character assassination – or even ‘attempted’ character assassination?”

That’s Atty. Ruy Rondain’s reply when asked about a purported plot by his law firm to do a hatchet job on Executive Secretary Ralph Recto.

Rondain told this writer yesterday he is one of four lawyers linked by the NBI to the plot. He said he and partner Atty. Orlando Mendiola have been subpoenaed to the NBI-National Capital Region on Friday.

Rondain declined to identify his two junior associates implicated by the NBI: “Kawawa naman sila, mga bata pa, hindi pa sanay sa ganito.”

“In deference to the NBI” he also would not say what statement to give to investigators. “I will just talk to news reporters afterwards.”

In headlines is news about Batangas Rep. Leandro Leviste’s supposed scheme to smear the reputation of political archfoe Executive Secretary Ralph Recto.

It started with the arrest on July 28th by NBI agents of a pimp and five trafficked women in an elite Manila hotel. During investigation the pimp alias “Ken” and one of the women alias “Jen” asked if their arrest had to do with their planned smear job.

NBI Director Melvin Matibag then told the press about the plan of “Ken”, “Jen”, and three of the four arrestees to execute affidavits linking Recto to drugs and illicit trysts in a Makati condo from 2022 to 2025.

Matibag said ex-congressman Jacinto “Jing” Paras met with “Ken” and “Jen” thrice – July 11th, 15th, 26th – to polish the tale.

Paras supposedly told “Ken” and “Jen” that Leviste will pay them P5 million – P1 million each for “Ken”, “Jen”, and the three other women. Another P500,000 is supposedly Paras’s commission, Matibag told Sapol-DWIZ Saturday.

Matibag said four lawyers were present in the July 15th and 26th meetings. In a sworn statement on Aug. 6th “Ken” identified the four lawyers through photographs.

“Ken” swore that the two junior associates brought laptops to take the false testimonies.

The smear job was supposed to have come in series, starting Aug. 2nd or 3rd, Matibag quoted “Ken” and “Jen”.
Matibag said one of the charges against Leviste, Paras, and the four lawyers could be subornation of perjury.
Subornation of perjury is the criminal act of persuading, inducing, or forcing another person to lie under oath. It can be through bribery or coercion.

But to carry weight, subornation of perjury must have been consummated via an actual false testimony.
Leviste and Paras have denied NBI’s allegations. Through their respective lawyers, Karen Danielle Fajardo and Mark Tolentino, they have also asked for specific charges before showing up at NBI-NCR yesterday, Tuesday.

The NBI announced, however, that Leviste flew to Hong Kong Aug. 2nd with no given return date.

Rondain said his associate Fajardo and his lawyer-daughter Gabrielle appeared at the NBI on Leviste’s behalf. He said Leviste engaged their services only this week.

Rondain and Mendiola have prominent – controversial – political clients. Foremost is ex-congressman Zaldy Co, reportedly hiding in Europe from criminal charges related to the P1.7-trillion flood control scam. Also from supposed death threats, since he linked President Bongbong Marcos, son Rep. Sandro Marcos, and ex-Speaker Martin Romualdez to the flood works scandal.

Rondain was also counsel in 2021 of then-Energy Secretary Alfonso Cusi in the latter’s controversial transfer of $565-million Chevron shares in Malampaya gas field to then-President Rody Duterte’s campaign contributor Dennis Uy.
Rondain was also counsel in 2006 of then-First Gentleman Mike Arroyo whom 36 journalists sued for P12.5-million damages.

Reports are that Leviste and Paras are targeting five other prominent officials for character assassination: Ombudsman Jesus Crispin Remulla, DILG Sec. Jonvic Remulla, DPWH Sec. Vince Dizon, DICT Sec. Henry Aguda, and Secretary to the Cabinet Benhur Abalos.

Paras and the Remulla brothers are members of the UP-Diliman fraternity Upsilon Sigma Phi. They joined in 1971, 1979, and 1987, respectively.

Paras’s lawyer is Atty. Mark Tolentino. A Lex Talionis frat brother of Duterte in San Beda Law, Tolentino was Assistant Secretary of Transportation in 2017. Paras and Tolentino could not be reached for comment.

Tolentino was removed in 2018 when linked to a €1.9-billion or $2.1-billion scandal of German payments processing firm Wirecard. The NBI investigated the case.

Matibag said it was “dismissed without prejudice, meaning it can be reopened whenever new evidence so warrants.”

* * *

Catch Sapol radio show, Saturdays, 8 to 10 a.m., dwIZ (882-AM).

Follow me on Facebook: https://tinyurl.com/Jarius-Bondoc

Damning testimony comes after Bong Revilla’s release

PNA Photo

Ex-senator Bong Revilla was allowed to post bail last Friday from non-bailable malversation raps.

“May trumabaho,” the ombudsman sneered Saturday.

On Tuesday a star witness testified to delivering P250-million malversed money to Revilla.

Revilla skipped the hearing, having paid P1-million bail.

Ombudsman Jesus Crispin Remulla’s remark insinuated ruses. Revilla’s counsel Ramon Esguerra manifested concern that it cast doubt on the integrity of the Sandiganbayan Third Division.

But Justices Ronald Moreno and Fritz delos Santos didn’t take offense. Moreno said that in his two decades as magistrate, “I have never been accused of being influenced, never been bribed and never inhibited.”

A Facebook reel on the controversial bail went viral. Political vlogger Chris Tan researched Moreno’s past rulings.

President Rody Duterte appointed Moreno to the anti-graft court in June 2018, Tan recounted. Three years later, Moreno was among four justices who cleared Makati ex-mayor Elenita Binay of malversation in overpriced hospital equipment.

In 2025, Moreno also penned the clearing of Makati ex-mayors Jojo and Junjun Binay of malversation, Tan added. It concerned what senators had scrutinized for overpriced parking building construction.

Tuesday’s star witness was DPWH ex-Usec. Roberto Bernardo. He swore to have brought P125-million cash to Revilla’s White House residence in 2024. Plus another P125 million in March 2025.

Driver-aide Vergel Niño Garcia also delivered P250 million in February 2025, Bernardo added.

The first delivery consisted of cash in six boxes and one paper bag. The second, 13 boxes. The third, six boxes.

The money was supposed to be for Revilla’s 2025 reelection campaign. He ran but lost under President Bongbong Marcos’ Alyansa para sa Bagong Pilipinas.

Malversation has four elements:

• offender is a public officer;

• he has custody or control of funds or property by reason of the duties of his office;

• government owns the funds or property involved for which he is accountable and

• he appropriated, took or misappropriated, or consented to, or through abandonment or negligence, permitted the taking by another person of such funds or property.

Malversation, like plunder, is non-bailable. Still, an accused can plead for bail as a matter of right. Justices hold bail hearings separate from the case proper.

Revilla’s bail petition was granted Friday morning. Custodians then brought him back to Quezon City Jail in Payatas, near Sandiganbayan. Lawyers worked on papers for the P1 million. Before dusk, Revilla was set free.

Revilla’s co-accused are DPWH Bulacan ex-district engineer Brice Hernandez, engineers Jaypee de Leon Mendoza, Arjay Salvador Domasig, Emelita Juat, accountant Juanito Mendoza and cashier Christina Mae Pineda.

The six have not been accorded bail.

On Tuesday Bernardo incriminated his ex-boss DPWH secretary Manuel Bonoan.

Bernardo detailed their modus operandi:

• Revilla approached him and asked for 25 percent “commitment fee.”

• Bonoan had access to DPWH allocations and discretion to set aside lump-sums for lawmakers who requested projects from him.

• Bonoan got 75 percent, and shared 25 percent each with Bernardo and fellow-Usec. Catalina Cabral (now deceased).

• Although denying participation in the ghost project in Pandi, Bulacan, Bernardo admitted to profiting from other lawmakers.

• Bernardo swore in his affidavit to have serviced Senators Jinggoy Estrada, Francis Escudero and former senator and Makati Mayor Nancy Binay.

Justices Moreno and Delos Santos concurred with Third Division chairman Justice Karl Miranda in denying bail to Revilla’s six co-accused.

Miranda dissented from Revilla’s bail grant, but was overruled by Moreno and Delos Santos, the decision author.

Justice Miranda asserted: “The prosecution was able to present strong evidence against Revilla to warrant the denial of his bail application… Alleged acts of Revilla may only be appreciated properly when contextualized in the kalakaran or scheme perpetrated in DPWH.

“There is strong evidence that Revilla committed the acts alleged in the Information, in furtherance of a conspiracy and this warrants the denial of his bail.

“It is not required to prove that Revilla personally intervened in congressional deliberations to ensure the funding of the project. It is sufficient to show that he committed overt acts, in the absence of which the project would not have been included in the General Appropriations Act.”

Revilla was among lawmakers implicated in 2013 in Janet Lim Napoles’ pork barrel scam. Despite acquittal in 2018, the Sandiganbayan ordered him to return P124.5 million. He refused because already declared innocent.

* * *

Catch Sapol radio show, Saturdays, 8 to 10 a.m., dwIZ (882-AM).

Follow me on Facebook: https://tinyurl.com/Jarius-Bondoc.

Site Terms & Conditions (scroll down for the buttons)

This site, jariusbondoc.com, is free for your use.

However, we do have some terms and conditions which you can find below. By continuing to use or to read from this site, that means you understand and agree to comply with the terms and conditions.

I. PRIVACY POLICY

This privacy policy (“policy”) will help you understand how jariusbondoc.com uses and protects the data you provide to us when you visit and use https://jariusbondoc.com/ (“website”, “service”).

We reserve the right to change this policy at any given time. If you want to make sure that you are up to date with the latest changes, we advise you to frequently visit this page.

 

What User Data We Collect

When you visit the website, we may collect the following data:

  • Your IP address
  • Your contact information and email address
  • Other information such as interests and preferences
  • Data profile regarding your online behavior on our website

 

Why We Collect Your Data

We are collecting your data for several reasons:

  • To better understand your needs
  • To improve our services and products
  • To send you promotional emails containing the information we think you will find interesting
  • To contact you to fill out surveys and participate in other types of market research
  • To customize our website according to your online behavior and personal preferences

 

Safeguarding and Securing the Data

jariusbondoc.com is committed to securing your data and keeping it confidential. jariusbondoc.com has done all in its power to prevent data theft, unauthorized access, and disclosure by implementing the latest technologies and software, which help us safeguard all the information we collect online.

 

Our Cookie Policy

Once you agree to allow our website to use cookies, you also agree to use the data it collects regarding your online behavior (analyze web traffic, web pages you spend the most time on, and websites you visit).

The data we collect by using cookies is used to customize our website to your needs. After we use the data for statistical analysis, the data is completely removed from our systems.

Please note that cookies don’t allow us to gain control of your computer in any way. They are strictly used to monitor which pages you find useful and which you do not so that we can provide a better experience for you.

If you want to disable cookies, you can do it by accessing the settings of your internet browser.

 

Links to Other Websites

Our website contains links that lead to other websites. If you click on these links jariusbondoc.com is not held responsible for your data and privacy protection. Visiting those websites is not governed by this privacy policy agreement. Make sure to read the privacy policy documentation of the website you go to from our website.

 

Restricting the Collection of your Personal Data

At some point, you might wish to restrict the use and collection of your personal data. You can achieve this by doing the following:

 

  • When you are filling the forms on the website, make sure to check if there is a box which you can leave unchecked, if you don’t want to disclose your personal information.
  • If you have already agreed to share your information with us, feel free to contact us via email and we will be more than happy to change this for you.

 

jariusbondoc.com will not lease, sell or distribute your personal information to any third parties, unless we have your permission. We might do so if the law forces us. Your personal information will be used when we need to send you promotional materials if you agree to this privacy policy.

 

II. COPYRIGHT NOTICE

All materials contained on this site are protected by the Republic of the Phlippines copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of jariusbondoc.com or in the case of third party materials, the owner of that content. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notice from copies of the content.

However, you may download material from jariusbondoc.com on the Web (one machine readable copy and one print copy per page) for your personal, noncommercial use only.

If you wish to use jariusbondoc.com content for commercial purposes, such as for content syndication etc., please contact us at jariusbondoconline@gmail.com.

Links to Websites other than those owned by jariusbondoc.com are offered as a service to readers. The editorial staff of jariusbondoc.com was not involved in their production and is not responsible for their content.

 

III. TERMS OF SERVICE

 

  1. GENERAL RULES AND DEFINITIONS

 

1.1 If you choose to use the jariusbondoc.com service (the “Service”), you will be agreeing to abide by all of the terms and conditions of this Agreement between you and jariusbondoc.com (“jariusbondoc.com “).

 

1.2 jariusbondoc.com may change, add or remove portions of this Agreement at any time, but if it does so, it will post such changes on the Service, or send them to you via e-mail. It is your responsibility to review this Agreement prior to each use of the Site and by continuing to use this Site, you agree to any changes.

 

1.3 If any of these rules or any future changes are unacceptable to you, you may cancel your membership by sending e-mail to jariusbondoconline.com (see section 10.1 regarding termination of service). Your continued use of the service now, or following the posting of notice of any changes in these operating rules, will indicate acceptance by you of such rules, changes, or modifications.

 

1.4 jariusbondoc.com may change, suspend or discontinue any aspect of the Service at any time, including the availability of any Service feature, database, or content. jariusbondoc.com may also impose limits on certain features and services or restrict your access to parts or all of the Service without notice or liability.

 

  1. JARIUSBONDOC.COM CONTENT AND MEMBER SUBMISSIONS

 

2.1 The contents of the jariusbondoc.com are intended for your personal, noncommercial use. All materials published on jariusbondoc.com (including, but not limited to news articles, photographs, images, illustrations, audio clips and video clips, also known as the “Content”) are protected by copyright, and owned or controlled by jariusbondoc.com or the party credited as the provider of the Content. You shall abide by all additional copyright notices, information, or restrictions contained in any Content accessed through the Service.

 

2.2 The Service and its Contents are protected by copyright pursuant to the Republic of the Philippines and international copyright laws. You may not modify, publish, transmit, participate in the transfer or sale of, reproduce (except as provided in Section 2.3 of this Agreement), create new works from, distribute, perform, display, or in any way exploit, any of the Content or the Service (including software) in whole or in part.

 

2.3 You may download or copy the Content and other downloadable items displayed on the Service for personal use only, provided that you maintain all copyright and other notices contained therein. Copying or storing of any Content for other than personal use is expressly prohibited without prior written permission from jariusbondoc.com or the copyright holder identified in the copyright notice contained in the Content.

 

  1. FORUMS, DISCUSSIONS AND USER GENERATED CONTENT

 

3.1 You shall not upload to, or distribute or otherwise publish on the message boards (the “Feedback Section”) any libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic, abusive, or otherwise illegal material.

 

3.2 (a)Be courteous. You agree that you will not threaten or verbally abuse jariusbondoc.com columnists and other jariusbondoc.com community Members, use defamatory language, or deliberately disrupt discussions with repetitive messages, meaningless messages or “spam.”

 

3.2 (b) Use respectful language. Like any community, the Feedback Sections will flourish only when our Members feel welcome and safe. You agree not to use language that abuses or discriminates on the basis of race, religion, nationality, gender, sexual preference, age, region, disability, etc. Hate speech of any kind is grounds for immediate and permanent suspension of access to all or part of the Service.

 

3.2 (c) Debate, but don’t attack. In a community full of opinions and preferences, people always disagree. jariusbondoc.com encourages active discussions and welcomes heated debate in our Feedback Sections. But personal attacks are a direct violation of this Agreement and are grounds for immediate and permanent suspension of access to all or part of the Service.

 

3.3 The Feedback Sections shall be used only in a noncommercial manner. You shall not, without the express approval of jariusbondoc.com, distribute or otherwise publish any material containing any solicitation of funds, advertising or solicitation for goods or services.

 

3.4 You are solely responsible for the content of your messages. However, while jariusbondoc.com does not and cannot review every message posted by you on the Forums and is not responsible for the content of these messages, jariusbondoc.com reserves the right to delete, move, or edit messages that it, in its sole discretion, deems abusive, defamatory, obscene, in violation of copyright or trademark laws, or otherwise unacceptable.

 

3.5 You acknowledge that any submissions you make to the Service (i.e., user-generated content including but not limited to: text, video, audio and photographs) (each, a “Submission”) may be edited, removed, modified, published, transmitted, and displayed by jariusbondoc.com and you waive any moral rights you may have in having the material altered or changed in a manner not agreeable to you. You grant jariusbondoc.com a perpetual, nonexclusive, world-wide, royalty free, sub-licensable license to the Submissions, which includes without limitation the right for jariusbondoc.com or any third party it designates, to use, copy, transmit, excerpt, publish, distribute, publicly display, publicly perform, create derivative works of, host, index, cache, tag, encode, modify and adapt (including without limitation the right to adapt to streaming, downloading, broadcast, mobile, digital, thumbnail, scanning or other technologies) in any form or media now known or hereinafter developed, any Submission posted by you on or to jariusbondoc.com or any other website owned by it, including any Submission posted on jariusbondoc.com through a third party.

 

3.6 By submitting an entry to jariusbondoc.com’s Readers’ Corner, you are consenting to its display on the site and for related online and offline promotional uses.

 

  1. ACCESS AND AVAILABILITY OF SERVICE AND LINKS

 

4.1 jariusbondoc.com contains links to other related World Wide Web Internet sites, resources, and sponsors of jariusbondoc.com. Since jariusbondoc.com is not responsible for the availability of these outside resources, or their contents, you should direct any concerns regarding any external link to the site administrator or Webmaster of such site.

 

  1. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES

 

5.1 You represent, warrant and covenant (a) that no materials of any kind submitted through your account will (i) violate, plagiarize, or infringe upon the rights of any third party, including copyright, trademark, privacy or other personal or proprietary rights; or (ii) contain libelous or otherwise unlawful material; and (b) that you are at least thirteen years old. You hereby indemnify, defend and hold harmless jariusbondoc.com, and all officers, directors, owners, agents, information providers, affiliates, licensors and licensees (collectively, the “Indemnified Parties”) from and against any and all liability and costs, including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys’ fees, incurred by the Indemnified Parties in connection with any claim arising out of any breach by you or any user of your account of this Agreement or the foregoing representations, warranties and covenants. You shall cooperate as fully as reasonably required in the defense of any such claim. jariusbondoc.com reserves the right, at its own expense, to assume the exclusive defense and control of any matter subject to indemnification by you.

 

5.2 jariusbondoc.com does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any advice, opinion, statement, or other information displayed, uploaded, or distributed through the Service by any user, information provider or any other person or entity. You acknowledge that any reliance upon any such opinion, advice, statement, memorandum, or information shall be at your sole risk. THE SERVICE AND ALL DOWNLOADABLE SOFTWARE ARE DISTRIBUTED ON AN “AS IS” BASIS WITHOUT WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, WARRANTIES OF TITLE OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. YOU HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT USE OF THE SERVICE IS AT YOUR SOLE RISK.

 

  1. COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN JARIUSBONDOC.COM AND MEMBERS

 

6.1 If you indicate on your registration form that you want to receive such information, jariusbondoc.com, its owners and assigns, will allow certain third party vendors to provide you with information about products and services.

 

6.2 jariusbondoc.com reserves the right to send electronic mail to you for the purpose of informing you of changes or additions to the Service.

 

6.3 jariusbondoc.com reserves the right to disclose information about your usage and demographics, provided that it will not reveal your personal identity in connection with the disclosure of such information. Advertisers and/or Licensees on our Web site may collect and share information about you only if you indicate your acceptance. For more information please read the Privacy Policy of jariusbondoc.com.

 

6.4 jariusbondoc.com may contact you via e-mail regarding your participation in user surveys, asking for feedback on the Website and existing or prospective products and services. This information will be used to improve our Website and better understand our users, and any information we obtain in such surveys will not be shared with third parties, except in aggregate form.

 

  1. TERMINATION

 

 

7.1 jariusbondoc.com may, in its sole discretion, terminate or suspend your access to all or part of the Service for any reason, including, without limitation, breach or assignment of this Agreement.

 

  1. MISCELLANEOUS

 

8.1 This Agreement has been made in and shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the Republic of the Philippines law. Any action to enforce this agreement shall be brought in the courts located in Manila, Philippines.

 

8.2 Notwithstanding any of the foregoing, nothing in this Terms of Service will serve to preempt the promises made in jariusbondoc.com Privacy Policy.

 

8.3 Correspondence should be sent to jariusbondoconline.com.

 

8.4 You agree to report any copyright violations of the Terms of Service to jariusbondoc.com as soon as you become aware of them. In the event you have a claim of copyright infringement with respect to material that is contained in the jariusbondoc.com service, please notify jariusbondoconline.com. This Terms of Service was last updated on November 7, 2020.