Select Page
Last credibility check: random manual audit

Last credibility check: random manual audit

PNA photo of vote counting machine

written on May 18, 2022

 

Was there fraud in the presidential and VP election? At least 1,800 vote counting machines (VCMs) broke down on E-Day, affecting 1.44 million voters. Comelec count was unusually fast. An hour after the close of balloting, 8:02 p.m., its transparency server tallied 20.05 million votes, representing 37.96 percent of votes cast (80.38 percent turnout, or 52.81 million of 65.7 million registered voters).

At once the votes of the two leading presidential candidates flattened at a ratio of 68:32 and continued till end of count. Possible in a landslide. But also at 8:02 p.m. a flat curve emerged till the end in the close fight between the third and fourth candidates. Same with the top two VP candidates. Highly improbable, mathematicians cite the Law of Large Numbers.

Given bailiwicks and varying voter patterns per region, candidates’ curves should first fluctuate then flatten in the end. Foolish to claim that pre-election surveys showed such results. Elections validate surveys, not the other way around.

Yet those are not evidence of fraud. At best, they’re only clues.

But set aside partisan passions. Forget who won or lost. Listen to what info-technologists and election experts say. Voters will see that May 9 was a flawed automated election – again. As in 2010, 2013, 2016 and 2019, provisions of the Automated Election Systems (AES) Law were unmet.

That law provides for an unbroken chain of safeguards and processes. “But there were too many gaps,” says Nelson Celis, PhD, of AES Watch. Among these were in:

(1) Digital signatures – Last March 23 Celis and National Press Club president Paul Gutierrez petitioned the Supreme Court. “Command the Comelec to assign digital signatures (passcodes) to the three election inspectors per precinct.” This was after Comelec said only those in Metro Manila, Cebu City and Davao City would be assigned passcodes from the roster of the Dept. of Information and Communications Technology. In the rest of Luzon, Visayas and Mindanao only the chairmen were to be given passcodes, not the two others. For authentication, three digital signatures must be keyed in to boot each of the 106,000 VCMs and transmit election returns (ERs). With only one signatory, any fraud can happen at precincts. The SC issued no mandamus.

(2) Monitoring of ballot printing and SD (secure digital) card formatting – Citing pandemic restrictions, Comelec disallowed monitoring by party reps and election watchdogs until after 70 percent of ballots already were printed. Pray that the ballots were untampered. One Filipino info-technologist reported to Comelec on March 22 when refused entry to witness the SD card formatting at the VCM warehouse. No action taken, Celis says.

(3) Documented results – Section 11 of the AES Law requires Comelec to release six findings 90 days before E-Day or Feb. 9. Those are: field test and mock election; audit of accuracy, functionality and security controls of AES software; source code review of VCMs, transmission router, consolidation/canvassing system; certification that the source codes are kept in escrow at the Bangko Sentral; certification that the reviewed source codes are those used by the equipment; and a continuity plan to avoid failure of elections at voting, counting or consolidation. Comelec resolved to release these only on May 6, three days before E-Day, stating that some findings were received only the previous day. It posted the resolution on May 11, two days after E-Day; the links to the findings cannot be opened or accessed. No Filipino IT expert was able to review it.

(4) Source code review of central, backup and transparency servers – A reputable international body must certify the source codes, in this case Pro V&V of America, 90 days before E-Day. Comelec must release details for scrutiny by Filipino experts as it did in 2010 with then-certifier SysTest Labs. Only then can Comelec issue a trusted-build, or executable file to run the VCMs and servers. Comelec issued a trusted-build in January and revised it in February. Source code reviews went on till April. “Reviewers say there were third and fourth revisions,” Celis remarks.

(5) Check of ERs versus transparency server – The tally of precinct ERs must jibe 100 percent with the transparency server because all came from the same 106,000 VCMs. But because of gaps in the four above processes, there could be variants. Watchdog Parish Pastoral Council for Responsible Voting did report 1.6 percent difference between its tally and the Comelec server. That represents 1,696 precinct VCMs or 1,356,800 votes. Could there be more, asks former DICT secretary Eliseo Rio.

(6) Random manual audit (RMA) – Ballots in 759 precincts, one per district or 607,200 votes, are to be manually checked against the ERs. Those must be chosen publicly by tambiolo at the close of balloting. Precinct inspectors must then commence audits, observed by party reps, watchdogs and voters. Since 2013 the selection has been behind closed doors. This 2022 Comelec did it via an Automated Random Selection Program in a laptop. Celis and Rio doubt if the ARSP source code was reviewed at all. The RMA is being held in a Manila venue. Comelec gave field offices two to five days to send over the ballot boxes. Who will transport the boxes? Are those properly sealed and padlocked? The RMA supervisor, watchdog National Citizens Movement for Free Elections, does not know the logistics firm; nor does it hold the padlock keys. “The teacher-auditors are in a bubble; they’re incommunicado,” says Namfrel chairman Gus Lagman, also former Comelec commissioner.

All these dent the credibility of Election 2022.

But there’s a remedy. Publicly re-select the 759 precincts. To shorten the time, prepare one tambiolo for each region. Open the audit to the public.

Sinovac safety efficacy and price still need clarifying

* * *

Catch “Sapol” radio show, Saturdays, 8-10 a.m., dwIZ (882-AM)

            “Gotcha: An Exposé on the Philippine Government” is available as e-book and paperback. Get a free copy of “Chapter 1: Beijing’s Bullying and Duplicity”. Simply subscribe to my newsletter HERE. Book orders also accepted there.

Sinovac safety efficacy and price still need clarifying

Start pimping our women to Chinese opportunists

Start pimping our women to Chinese opportunists

stock image

written on May 11, 2022

 

We elected China’s candidates. We voted plundering dynasts. Now suffer the consequence.

We ignored the telltales. He entertains Chinese commissars at home. He rejects sea patrol helicopters and boats. The running mate echoes her father’s acquiescence to China’s Communist Party. She intends to be Defense secretary to continue it.

Our fishermen will remain unprotected. Chinese maritime militia will drive them away to poach more fish. China warships will occupy more Philippine reefs. Partnering with the presidential crony, China’s National Offshore Oil Corp. will take over Malampaya gas field.

Six years of Malacañang obeisance emboldened 3,000 Chinese spies to infiltrate our communities, industries, universities and media. We witnessed Chinese fly-by-nights pillage P42 billion in overpriced pandemic supplies.

Pharmally was prime proof of the infiltration and pillage. Exposed in Senate hearings, it was financed by a Chinese state agent-presidential pal. The Filipina wife of another Chinese principal in Pharmally, she who wakes up to find another brand-new limousine in her garage, ran for Congress. Yet 83 percent of us hailed admin’s pandemic response.

Money-worshippers, we sold our votes. Chinese opportunists will take our women as mistresses. They will be their front to own land, utilities, mines and retail shops. We might as well pimp to them our daughters, wives, sisters and young mothers. We can then snort their shabu.

“Stop crying like a woman for what you could not defend as a man,” Aixa al-Hurra (the honored) berated her son Boabdil, the vanquished emir of Granada.

We put back Manchurian Candidates in our legislature, provincial capitols, city and municipal halls. From there they can continue abetting agricultural over-imports from China. Tariffs will be slashed lower than ever. Smuggling will thrive.

Never mind that our grains, vegetable, fruit, hog and poultry growers go on losing from unfair competition. What’s important is for China’s lackey-electees and bureaucrats to profiteer.

The dynasts’ only motive is plunder. Like traitors during the American and Japanese regimes, they collaborate with Chinese communists in order to retain power. They will fragment into fiefdoms, the easier for the CCP to rule.

We had a chance for change. We blew it. Despite lack of six documented test results, we accepted Comelec’s certification of the automated election system.

Now bear what will come. Global ostracism. Emigration of the thinking class. Worse malnutrition, miseducation, misrule. Inflation. Joblessness. Higher taxes and public borrowings. Distrust of government. The price of rice will drop to the promised P20, but only for a fistful.

The people have spoken, China’s candidates claim. The voice of the people is the voice of God, we delude ourselves. But was it God’s will that the mob chose Barabas over Jesus?

Sinovac safety efficacy and price still need clarifying

* * *

Catch “Sapol” radio show, Saturdays, 8-10 a.m., dwIZ (882-AM)

            “Gotcha: An Exposé on the Philippine Government” is available as e-book and paperback. Get a free copy of “Chapter 1: Beijing’s Bullying and Duplicity”. Simply subscribe to my newsletter HERE. Book orders also accepted there.

Sinovac safety efficacy and price still need clarifying

If only children could vote, they’d plead…

If only children could vote, they’d plead…

photo from Philippine News Agency

written on April 29, 2022

 

“…Ayoko maging bansot, ayoko maging payatot, ayoko maging kulelat.”

Which child indeed would wish to be stunted and wasting? Who’d want to lose out on life from the start?

One in three Filipino children aged 0 to 5 are underheight and underweight. They numbered 3.4 million in 2019, although the malady has afflicted the land for three decades. A stunted, wasting child loses up to 40 percent of brain mass, reducing the capacity for language skills, memory and comprehension. That largely explains why Filipino 3rd, 5th and 8th graders in public schools rank lowest in international tests in Reading, Math and Sciences.

The impact is devastating. Stunted children have ten times less chances than others to survive common childhood illnesses. Most lose five years of schooling. Result, 40 percent lower wages as workers. Also, less healthy families when they begin a new generation.

Malnutrition is the main culprit. Filipinos are the second shortest in ASEAN. Yet this is dismissed as hereditary rather than due to poor maternal health, deprivation and child undernourishment. Malnutrition kills 95 under-5 children daily. The country loses $4.3 billion yearly, 1.5 percent of 2015 GDP, Unicef noted.

But there’s a solution. And only presidential candidate Leni Robredo espouses it, according to scientists. Being the only mother among ten contenders, she understands the family’s critical needs: right food, health care, proper schooling. Those have been her focus as development worker, congresswoman and Vice President. Dozens of nutrition and child care advocates, health professionals and educators have endorsed her.

Most basic is the First 1000 Days program. From conception to 23rd month, mother and child must be afforded necessary nutrients. The first thousand days are vital for a child’s optimal growth and brain development. Also for the mother to prepare for possible next pregnancy.

Leni’s platform banners the F1K program. She links food security and production to nutrition. VP running mate Kiko Pangilinan brings agricultural expertise. Agriculture’s objective should be public health.

Success stories are many. Peru reduced child stunting from 28 percent in 2008 to 13 percent in 2016; Brazil, from 37.1 percent in 1974 to 7.1 percent in 2006. The latter put up a social development ministry to quell hunger as socio-economic goal. The former set stunting reduction as an outcome of food abundance. By child nutrition, China boosted the average height of 19-year-old males by 3.5 inches (9 cm) and females by 2.5 inches (6.35 cm) in the 35 years to 2019, according to Lancet. India’s 16-year-old males and females grew taller by 2.5 and 2 inches from 1975 to 2015, Economist reported. Filipino females became shorter in the past 40 years, health department records show.

F1K has been replicated in Quezon and Cebu by, among others, retired Unicef officer Cecilio Adorna, economics professor Luzeta Adorna, World Bank consultant Cecilia Acuin and Nutrition Center Philippines senior researcher Ellen Villate. Signed by 170, their endorsement of Leni is in signatories (alphabetically) – Google Sheets.

Education Nation also endorsed Leni this week. The coalition of 35 organizations and 21 educators gave her platform and track record a perfect score. A job interview of Leni by the Coordinating Council of Private Educational Associations of the Philippines drew her stand: “One of the first things I’ll do if elected is to declare an emergency crisis. Kailangan natin ito gawin para all hands on deck tayo.” Meaning government, schools, teachers, parents, students and other stakeholders.

EducNation has been warning of a three-decades-long learning crisis. Indicators: 85 percent of 10-year-olds cannot read simple text (Unicef 2022). Grade 3 students have difficulty in reading: 56.8 percent in English, 60.9 percent in Filipino. Few Grade 5 students meet the proficiencies of their level: Reading, ten of 100; Writing, two of 100; Math, 17 of 100. To make room for next batches, Junior high schoolers are promoted despite low proficiencies: only one percent adept in Math, three percent in English, one percent in Science, 13 percent in Filipino, ten percent in Araling Panlipunan. In 12 years of schooling, Filipinos learn only six-and-a-half years’ equivalent, compared to foreign counterparts. Only half of Education graduates pass the annual teacher licensure exams; three in four are repeat examinees.

The education department has removed History from high school and relegated it to elementary. “The topic of martial law 1972-1986 is taught only for one week in Grade 6,” laments Antonio Calipjo Go, PhD, head of Marian School-Quezon City. “Critical thinking is not fully formed at that school age, so children become susceptible to fake news and historical revisionism.”

“MaJoHa,” a teen contestant in reality show Pinoy Big Brother answered when asked for the acronym of the three priests Gomez, Burgos, Zamora garroted by Spanish rulers in 1872, stoking Filipino nationalism. “Ajajozep” replied another. The admin standard-bearer is criticized for falsifying the past; the running mate’s dynasty has not set up a city high school or college in 30 years.

Pandemic lockdowns, fears and hasty shift to online classes worsened things: 1.1 million students did not enrol in 2020-2021. One in four kindergartners was not in school. Three out of four public schools had no WiFi. One in four parents said their children learned nothing. Usually better in instruction, 1,179 private schools closed shop.

Figures from NGO Philippine Business for Education: Rating the six survey-leading presidential bets, PBEd found “Leni the only one with a detailed strategy to take us out of this mess,” said policy-advocacy manager Marco delos Reyes. PBEd president Chito Salazar added: “Let’s choose a leader who understands the problem of education and listens to all sectors. We need someone with competence, experience and character to be an Education President.” See https://www.facebook.com/100305568984268/posts/281263100888513/?d=n

 

Sinovac safety efficacy and price still need clarifying

* * *

Catch “Sapol” radio show, Saturdays, 8-10 a.m., dwIZ (882-AM)

            “Gotcha: An Exposé on the Philippine Government” is available as e-book and paperback. Get a free copy of “Chapter 1: Beijing’s Bullying and Duplicity”. Simply subscribe to my newsletter HERE. Book orders also accepted there.

Sinovac safety efficacy and price still need clarifying

Agri-smuggling likely a cover for shabu

Agri-smuggling likely a cover for shabu

photo from Philippine News Agency

written on April 27, 2022

 

Narcotics authorities can put two and two together. A mere P1 million worth of smuggled agricultural produce carries life sentence for economic sabotage, with no bail while on trial. Yet smugglers sell the contraband at only a fraction of domestic rates. It’s like they just want to unload the illegal goods even at no profit. Why take such inordinate risk?

Example: wholesale price of smuggled red onion, P3 per kilo; retail price of Mindoro-grown, P100 per kilo. Carrots: wholesale smuggled, P40 per kilo; retail of Benguet-grown, P140. Same with broccoli, cauliflower, white onion, celery, leeks, garlic, strawberry. It’s the market vendors and sari-sari store owners who make a bonanza. What gives?

Most of the smuggled produce comes from China. Also from China come such over-imported items that are not in short domestic production to begin with: fish like galunggong, bonito, tulingan, mackerel, sardine; chicken and pork; corn and feeds.

Could the agricultural contraband be mere cover for more profitable trafficking – say, narcotics?

The bulk of shabu (meth) originates from China too. Since the 1990s, Gen. Jose Almonte has warned of a Chinese Communist Party plot to soften the Philippine state. Foremost is by drug addiction; another is by influencing then indoctrinating Filipino officials, academics and businessmen.

Almonte was then Economic Intelligence and Investigation Bureau chief, and later national security adviser and National Intelligence Coordinating Agency head. People’s Liberation Army generals led the shabu smuggling to the Philippines and neighbors, he said. Beijing was beginning to grab 25 shoals and reefs in the South China Sea, including seven from the Philippines: Kagitingan (Fiery Cross), Zamora (Subi), McKennan (Hughes), Calderon (Cuarteron), Mabini (Johnson South), Burgos (Gaven) and Panganiban (Mischief). At first, the shabu was cooked in mainland China, later relegated to erstwhile opium makers in the Golden Triangle of Thailand, Laos and Myanmar.

Shabu trafficking thrives to this day, notwithstanding troll hossanas to President Rodrigo Duterte’s bloody war on drugs. The market remains big: three million hardcore addicts. In November 2019, then-PNP Drug Enforcement Group head Gen. Romeo Caramat said each snorted one gram of shabu a week. That’s a staggering three million grams – 3,000 kilos or three tons. Value: P25 billion a week, Caramat said.

Only a fraction has been interdicted by the Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency. From July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2019, its #RealNumbersPH reported 4,409 kilos of shabu seized. That’s only a week-and-a-half’s consumption confiscated in 156 weeks, with 7,000 killed, including lawmen.

During that same period, PDEA dismantled 14 clandestine shabu labs; hardly any remain today because they are easily detectable by foul odor fumes. Easier to sneak in shabu by various means: inside printing machine cylinders, magnetic lifters, mannequins, tea bags. In the early 2000s, shabu was interspersed with CFL bulbs, which was why those retailed at giveaway P11 apiece. Narco-traffickers recently tried tapioca starch as decoy.

So why not also smuggled and over-imported agricultural products as fronts?

Sneaking in just one kilo of shabu, the size of a kilo-bag of sugar, can fetch a street value of P8 million. What more if by the ton, P8 billion. Same risks – life term, no bail – but infinitely bigger profit. No wonder.

Additional figures derive from Senate and House inquiries. The Senate hearing was by the Committee of the Whole because of multi-departmental concerns: agriculture, health, trade, finance, Customs, BIR, justice and national security. Senate President Tito Sotto elicited that Customs confiscated 542 shipments worth P1.99 billion since 2016.

That’s only one-twentieth of the annual P40-billion smuggling of produce. “Alay lang ’yan,” party-list Rep. Jericho Nograles (Puwersa ng Bayaning Atleta) told Sapol-dwIZ Saturday. “Smugglers sacrificed the nearly P2-billion shipments, for crooked officials to have something to show for it, but quietly sneaked in the higher volume.” He cited figures from Federation of Free Farmers chairman Leonardo Montemayor. Since 2013, the smugglers’ shipment declarations to Customs were invariably much lower than records from Chinese and ASEAN ports of origin. Most were even misdeclared, like white onion passed off as green for animal feed but sold to consumers. Or well-milled, long-grain rice disguised as 100-percent broken, also for feeds.

This can go on if China’s candidates for president and VP win. Leading in preferential surveys, they vow to continue present programs. Meaning retain crooked officials, bribing racketeers and kinsmen-protectors. China’s drugging of Filipinos will worsen.

 

Sinovac safety efficacy and price still need clarifying

* * *

Catch “Sapol” radio show, Saturdays, 8-10 a.m., dwIZ (882-AM)

            “Gotcha: An Exposé on the Philippine Government” is available as e-book and paperback. Get a free copy of “Chapter 1: Beijing’s Bullying and Duplicity”. Simply subscribe to my newsletter HERE. Book orders also accepted there.

Sinovac safety efficacy and price still need clarifying

Agricultural over-importing, smuggling can only go on

Agricultural over-importing, smuggling can only go on

photo from Philippine News Agency

written on April 22, 2022

 

The Duterte admin misunderstands food security. It over-imports agricultural produce, mostly from China, at slashed tariffs. An illusion of plenty is created.

Yet insecurity results. Domestic growers of grains, vegetables, fruits, sugarcane, hogs, chicken and fish falter. So do makers of feeds, fertilizers, pesticides. No funds are raised to support them. Agricultural workers, one-fourth of total manpower, lose jobs. The rural population, 57.6 percent of total, goes hungry.

The over-importing fosters smuggling, also mostly from China. Diseased pork and poultry are sneaked in and infect local stocks. Frozen fish and fresh produce, soaked in formaldehyde, elude phytosanitary inspection. Filipinos are sickened. Yet no one goes to jail.

Over-importing is likely to go on in the next admin. The ruling party’s candidates for president and VP are leading in preferential surveys. Both profess closeness to the Chinese Communist Party and vow to continue present programs. The agriculture secretary is seeking re-appointment by them. That sworn testimony in last week’s hearing of the Senate Committee of the Whole alarmed opposition presidential candidate Senator Ping Lacson.

That hearing was informative. Contraband worth at least P1 million fetches life-term, no-bail economic sabotage. Customs since 2016 has interdicted 542 shipments valued at P1.99 billion, averaging P3.67 million each. Only one culprit has been haled to court, out on bail on minor charges. Over-imports and smuggling enrich only China, its local partners and crooked officials.

Food security can be achieved not by over-importing but by over-producing what we need. Imports must only be of short stocks, and only to subsidize small planters. Thus can domestic supply multiply, prices stabilize and quality improve. Surplus is stored for rainy days. Domestic producers can earn from exports.

The opposite is happening. Domestic producers are dying.

Over-dependence on China is risky. If China’s agricultural stocks run out for whatever reason, Filipinos will have no more source.

That can be sooner than later. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, which China applauds, has disrupted this mid-spring’s wheat planting season. One-third of the world’s wheat comes from the warring lands; a 90-day delay in harvest results in global shortage. Shifting to other grains may not suffice. Ninety-eight percent of fertilizers derive from natural gas, of which Russia and Ukraine are also major extractors. Farms worldwide will be untended. Food prices will soar. Rich countries will corner the meager stocks. Famine will worsen pandemic and joblessness in poorer lands.

The admin candidates say they will continue to set aside Manila’s arbitral victory against Beijing at The Hague. They belittle sea and air patrol craft. Joint military drills with allies will halt. Those will further weaken the defense of maritime jurisdictions. Chinese warships and fisheries militia will be able to trespass more frequently and in greater numbers the West Philippine Sea, Benham Rise and internal waters. More fish will be poached, shoals robbed of mollusks and crustaceans, and gas and oilfields occupied.

Beijing will lend its triumphant Filipino candidates for showcase projects. Once debt-trapped, Manila will cede sea and airports to China, the way Sri Lanka, Ecuador, Djibouti and many others were arm-twisted. Like those countries, the Philippines is over-borrowed. The Duterte admin has more than doubled the public debt in six years, from P5.5 trillion to P12.5 trillion. Yet huge estate and other taxes remain uncollected.

Sri Lanka has defaulted on debt payments in order to import food and fuel. The turmoil that now rocks it may also befall the Philippines, shuddered another opposition presidential aspirant, Manila Mayor Isko Moreno. But he, Lacson and yet another, Norberto Gonzales, refuse to unite the Opposition to defeat the admin. Gonzales was national security adviser and defense secretary of the ex-President who principally supports the admin tandem.

Sinovac safety efficacy and price still need clarifying

* * *

Catch “Sapol” radio show, Saturdays, 8-10 a.m., dwIZ (882-AM)

            “Gotcha: An Exposé on the Philippine Government” is available as e-book and paperback. Get a free copy of “Chapter 1: Beijing’s Bullying and Duplicity”. Simply subscribe to my newsletter HERE. Book orders also accepted there.

Sinovac safety efficacy and price still need clarifying

Memories of paying income, estate taxes

Memories of paying income, estate taxes

Logo of Bureau of Internal Revenue

written on April 20, 2022

 

Beating last Monday’s deadline to file income tax returns reminded me of a recent Comelec ruling. “Failure to file tax returns is not inherently wrong in the absence of a law punishing it.” In crafting that, Commissioners Aimee Ferolino and Marlon Casquejo were referring to 1982, 1983, 1984 and 1985. Bongbong Marcos Jr. had been convicted of non-filing of ITRs as Ilocos vice governor then governor in those four years. Disqualifications under election and tax laws notwithstanding, they deemed Marcos Jr. eligible to run for president.

I wish I had Ferolino and Casquejo’s assurance of no penalty back in the 80s. Every year then in March, Ferdinand Marcos Sr.’s controlled media flashed warnings of various punishments for illegally missing the mid-month deadline. Nobody dared run afoul of martial law, lest be imprisoned without charges, tortured and stripped of possessions.

I was employed in 1981 to 1983 in the newspaper of Marcos Sr.’s brother-in-law Ambassador Kokoy Romualdez. For three yearends my compensation Form W-2 showed that income tax was over-withheld every payday. All of us earners filed ITRs. Despite my tax overpayments, the BIR never gave me a refund or credit for the following year.

It was like the medieval age, when the king owned everything and heavily taxed the serfs on pain of flogging, being thrown to the dungeons and seizure of farms. Yet the lavishly-living royal family was tax-exempt.

Aside from income tax, also deducted from monthly salaries were SSS, headed by a Marcos crony kin; Medicare, headed by Marcos’ brother Dr. Pacifico Marcos; and Pag-IBIG, under Human Settlements Minister Imelda Romualdez Marcos.

A footnote to that work stint was that several employees and I were fired three days before Christmas 1983. In busting the new labor union, management dismissed the officers and five like me who falsely were accused of advising them. My wife was pregnant. Ninoy Aquino had been assassinated and the economy was collapsing from government over-borrowing and conjugal plundering. With inflation the following year Filipinos suffered price spikes of food, medicines and fuel. Infant supplements for my newborn disappeared from grocery shelves.

Most Filipinos who survived that harrowing period have forgiven those who caused and benefited from it. Still the basis to clear Marcos Jr. of tax culpability stirs up memories.

Fathers had a way then of inculcating taxpaying duty on youngsters. From age 13 in 1969, I as eldest son was assigned to line up at Quezon City Hall to get the real property and business tax assessments. I would return a week or two later to re-line up and hand over the check payments. Male friends and cousins of the same age did likewise for parents in Manila, Pateros and elsewhere. Sweaty errands in those days of no air-conditioning in buses and offices. A far cry from when Sonny Belmonte, upon becoming QC Mayor in 2010, started serving espresso in a cool special lounge for taxpayers. Tougher was the task of income tax paying for Dad every March; the queues at the BIR building snaked up to two blocks.

Only six years after Dad passed away in 1980 was the family able to pay the estate tax plus penalties and surcharges. We siblings inherited about P130,000 each, enough show money for me to take out a small home loan. There’s no escaping death and taxes. From retired Supreme Court justice Antonio Carpio, Filipinos now learn that the law requires even plunderers’ heirs to pay income and estate taxes.

Sinovac safety efficacy and price still need clarifying

* * *

Catch “Sapol” radio show, Saturdays, 8-10 a.m., dwIZ (882-AM)

            “Gotcha: An Exposé on the Philippine Government” is available as e-book and paperback. Get a free copy of “Chapter 1: Beijing’s Bullying and Duplicity”. Simply subscribe to my newsletter HERE. Book orders also accepted there.

Sinovac safety efficacy and price still need clarifying

Site Terms & Conditions (scroll down for the buttons)

This site, jariusbondoc.com, is free for your use.

However, we do have some terms and conditions which you can find below. By continuing to use or to read from this site, that means you understand and agree to comply with the terms and conditions.

I. PRIVACY POLICY

This privacy policy (“policy”) will help you understand how jariusbondoc.com uses and protects the data you provide to us when you visit and use https://jariusbondoc.com/ (“website”, “service”).

We reserve the right to change this policy at any given time. If you want to make sure that you are up to date with the latest changes, we advise you to frequently visit this page.

 

What User Data We Collect

When you visit the website, we may collect the following data:

  • Your IP address
  • Your contact information and email address
  • Other information such as interests and preferences
  • Data profile regarding your online behavior on our website

 

Why We Collect Your Data

We are collecting your data for several reasons:

  • To better understand your needs
  • To improve our services and products
  • To send you promotional emails containing the information we think you will find interesting
  • To contact you to fill out surveys and participate in other types of market research
  • To customize our website according to your online behavior and personal preferences

 

Safeguarding and Securing the Data

jariusbondoc.com is committed to securing your data and keeping it confidential. jariusbondoc.com has done all in its power to prevent data theft, unauthorized access, and disclosure by implementing the latest technologies and software, which help us safeguard all the information we collect online.

 

Our Cookie Policy

Once you agree to allow our website to use cookies, you also agree to use the data it collects regarding your online behavior (analyze web traffic, web pages you spend the most time on, and websites you visit).

The data we collect by using cookies is used to customize our website to your needs. After we use the data for statistical analysis, the data is completely removed from our systems.

Please note that cookies don’t allow us to gain control of your computer in any way. They are strictly used to monitor which pages you find useful and which you do not so that we can provide a better experience for you.

If you want to disable cookies, you can do it by accessing the settings of your internet browser.

 

Links to Other Websites

Our website contains links that lead to other websites. If you click on these links jariusbondoc.com is not held responsible for your data and privacy protection. Visiting those websites is not governed by this privacy policy agreement. Make sure to read the privacy policy documentation of the website you go to from our website.

 

Restricting the Collection of your Personal Data

At some point, you might wish to restrict the use and collection of your personal data. You can achieve this by doing the following:

 

  • When you are filling the forms on the website, make sure to check if there is a box which you can leave unchecked, if you don’t want to disclose your personal information.
  • If you have already agreed to share your information with us, feel free to contact us via email and we will be more than happy to change this for you.

 

jariusbondoc.com will not lease, sell or distribute your personal information to any third parties, unless we have your permission. We might do so if the law forces us. Your personal information will be used when we need to send you promotional materials if you agree to this privacy policy.

 

II. COPYRIGHT NOTICE

All materials contained on this site are protected by the Republic of the Phlippines copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of jariusbondoc.com or in the case of third party materials, the owner of that content. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notice from copies of the content.

However, you may download material from jariusbondoc.com on the Web (one machine readable copy and one print copy per page) for your personal, noncommercial use only.

If you wish to use jariusbondoc.com content for commercial purposes, such as for content syndication etc., please contact us at jariusbondoconline@gmail.com.

Links to Websites other than those owned by jariusbondoc.com are offered as a service to readers. The editorial staff of jariusbondoc.com was not involved in their production and is not responsible for their content.

 

III. TERMS OF SERVICE

 

  1. GENERAL RULES AND DEFINITIONS

 

1.1 If you choose to use the jariusbondoc.com service (the “Service”), you will be agreeing to abide by all of the terms and conditions of this Agreement between you and jariusbondoc.com (“jariusbondoc.com “).

 

1.2 jariusbondoc.com may change, add or remove portions of this Agreement at any time, but if it does so, it will post such changes on the Service, or send them to you via e-mail. It is your responsibility to review this Agreement prior to each use of the Site and by continuing to use this Site, you agree to any changes.

 

1.3 If any of these rules or any future changes are unacceptable to you, you may cancel your membership by sending e-mail to jariusbondoconline.com (see section 10.1 regarding termination of service). Your continued use of the service now, or following the posting of notice of any changes in these operating rules, will indicate acceptance by you of such rules, changes, or modifications.

 

1.4 jariusbondoc.com may change, suspend or discontinue any aspect of the Service at any time, including the availability of any Service feature, database, or content. jariusbondoc.com may also impose limits on certain features and services or restrict your access to parts or all of the Service without notice or liability.

 

  1. JARIUSBONDOC.COM CONTENT AND MEMBER SUBMISSIONS

 

2.1 The contents of the jariusbondoc.com are intended for your personal, noncommercial use. All materials published on jariusbondoc.com (including, but not limited to news articles, photographs, images, illustrations, audio clips and video clips, also known as the “Content”) are protected by copyright, and owned or controlled by jariusbondoc.com or the party credited as the provider of the Content. You shall abide by all additional copyright notices, information, or restrictions contained in any Content accessed through the Service.

 

2.2 The Service and its Contents are protected by copyright pursuant to the Republic of the Philippines and international copyright laws. You may not modify, publish, transmit, participate in the transfer or sale of, reproduce (except as provided in Section 2.3 of this Agreement), create new works from, distribute, perform, display, or in any way exploit, any of the Content or the Service (including software) in whole or in part.

 

2.3 You may download or copy the Content and other downloadable items displayed on the Service for personal use only, provided that you maintain all copyright and other notices contained therein. Copying or storing of any Content for other than personal use is expressly prohibited without prior written permission from jariusbondoc.com or the copyright holder identified in the copyright notice contained in the Content.

 

  1. FORUMS, DISCUSSIONS AND USER GENERATED CONTENT

 

3.1 You shall not upload to, or distribute or otherwise publish on the message boards (the “Feedback Section”) any libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic, abusive, or otherwise illegal material.

 

3.2 (a)Be courteous. You agree that you will not threaten or verbally abuse jariusbondoc.com columnists and other jariusbondoc.com community Members, use defamatory language, or deliberately disrupt discussions with repetitive messages, meaningless messages or “spam.”

 

3.2 (b) Use respectful language. Like any community, the Feedback Sections will flourish only when our Members feel welcome and safe. You agree not to use language that abuses or discriminates on the basis of race, religion, nationality, gender, sexual preference, age, region, disability, etc. Hate speech of any kind is grounds for immediate and permanent suspension of access to all or part of the Service.

 

3.2 (c) Debate, but don’t attack. In a community full of opinions and preferences, people always disagree. jariusbondoc.com encourages active discussions and welcomes heated debate in our Feedback Sections. But personal attacks are a direct violation of this Agreement and are grounds for immediate and permanent suspension of access to all or part of the Service.

 

3.3 The Feedback Sections shall be used only in a noncommercial manner. You shall not, without the express approval of jariusbondoc.com, distribute or otherwise publish any material containing any solicitation of funds, advertising or solicitation for goods or services.

 

3.4 You are solely responsible for the content of your messages. However, while jariusbondoc.com does not and cannot review every message posted by you on the Forums and is not responsible for the content of these messages, jariusbondoc.com reserves the right to delete, move, or edit messages that it, in its sole discretion, deems abusive, defamatory, obscene, in violation of copyright or trademark laws, or otherwise unacceptable.

 

3.5 You acknowledge that any submissions you make to the Service (i.e., user-generated content including but not limited to: text, video, audio and photographs) (each, a “Submission”) may be edited, removed, modified, published, transmitted, and displayed by jariusbondoc.com and you waive any moral rights you may have in having the material altered or changed in a manner not agreeable to you. You grant jariusbondoc.com a perpetual, nonexclusive, world-wide, royalty free, sub-licensable license to the Submissions, which includes without limitation the right for jariusbondoc.com or any third party it designates, to use, copy, transmit, excerpt, publish, distribute, publicly display, publicly perform, create derivative works of, host, index, cache, tag, encode, modify and adapt (including without limitation the right to adapt to streaming, downloading, broadcast, mobile, digital, thumbnail, scanning or other technologies) in any form or media now known or hereinafter developed, any Submission posted by you on or to jariusbondoc.com or any other website owned by it, including any Submission posted on jariusbondoc.com through a third party.

 

3.6 By submitting an entry to jariusbondoc.com’s Readers’ Corner, you are consenting to its display on the site and for related online and offline promotional uses.

 

  1. ACCESS AND AVAILABILITY OF SERVICE AND LINKS

 

4.1 jariusbondoc.com contains links to other related World Wide Web Internet sites, resources, and sponsors of jariusbondoc.com. Since jariusbondoc.com is not responsible for the availability of these outside resources, or their contents, you should direct any concerns regarding any external link to the site administrator or Webmaster of such site.

 

  1. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES

 

5.1 You represent, warrant and covenant (a) that no materials of any kind submitted through your account will (i) violate, plagiarize, or infringe upon the rights of any third party, including copyright, trademark, privacy or other personal or proprietary rights; or (ii) contain libelous or otherwise unlawful material; and (b) that you are at least thirteen years old. You hereby indemnify, defend and hold harmless jariusbondoc.com, and all officers, directors, owners, agents, information providers, affiliates, licensors and licensees (collectively, the “Indemnified Parties”) from and against any and all liability and costs, including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys’ fees, incurred by the Indemnified Parties in connection with any claim arising out of any breach by you or any user of your account of this Agreement or the foregoing representations, warranties and covenants. You shall cooperate as fully as reasonably required in the defense of any such claim. jariusbondoc.com reserves the right, at its own expense, to assume the exclusive defense and control of any matter subject to indemnification by you.

 

5.2 jariusbondoc.com does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any advice, opinion, statement, or other information displayed, uploaded, or distributed through the Service by any user, information provider or any other person or entity. You acknowledge that any reliance upon any such opinion, advice, statement, memorandum, or information shall be at your sole risk. THE SERVICE AND ALL DOWNLOADABLE SOFTWARE ARE DISTRIBUTED ON AN “AS IS” BASIS WITHOUT WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, WARRANTIES OF TITLE OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. YOU HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT USE OF THE SERVICE IS AT YOUR SOLE RISK.

 

  1. COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN JARIUSBONDOC.COM AND MEMBERS

 

6.1 If you indicate on your registration form that you want to receive such information, jariusbondoc.com, its owners and assigns, will allow certain third party vendors to provide you with information about products and services.

 

6.2 jariusbondoc.com reserves the right to send electronic mail to you for the purpose of informing you of changes or additions to the Service.

 

6.3 jariusbondoc.com reserves the right to disclose information about your usage and demographics, provided that it will not reveal your personal identity in connection with the disclosure of such information. Advertisers and/or Licensees on our Web site may collect and share information about you only if you indicate your acceptance. For more information please read the Privacy Policy of jariusbondoc.com.

 

6.4 jariusbondoc.com may contact you via e-mail regarding your participation in user surveys, asking for feedback on the Website and existing or prospective products and services. This information will be used to improve our Website and better understand our users, and any information we obtain in such surveys will not be shared with third parties, except in aggregate form.

 

  1. TERMINATION

 

 

7.1 jariusbondoc.com may, in its sole discretion, terminate or suspend your access to all or part of the Service for any reason, including, without limitation, breach or assignment of this Agreement.

 

  1. MISCELLANEOUS

 

8.1 This Agreement has been made in and shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the Republic of the Philippines law. Any action to enforce this agreement shall be brought in the courts located in Manila, Philippines.

 

8.2 Notwithstanding any of the foregoing, nothing in this Terms of Service will serve to preempt the promises made in jariusbondoc.com Privacy Policy.

 

8.3 Correspondence should be sent to jariusbondoconline.com.

 

8.4 You agree to report any copyright violations of the Terms of Service to jariusbondoc.com as soon as you become aware of them. In the event you have a claim of copyright infringement with respect to material that is contained in the jariusbondoc.com service, please notify jariusbondoconline.com. This Terms of Service was last updated on November 7, 2020.