Select Page
Chevron charged in US too over Malampaya sale

Chevron charged in US too over Malampaya sale

by | Apr 12, 2023 | Gotcha

PNA photos of Malampaya Gas Field

GOTCHA

written on February 11, 2022

 

 

A complaint against Chevron was to be filed Thursday in the United States over its sale of interests in the Philippines’ Malampaya gas field. Filipino-American complainants allege that the oil giant, through Philippine subsidiaries, committed “multiple misrepresentations and concealments to shareholders.”

In the “groundbreaking” case, eight Fil-Am leaders referred to the transfer of interest by Chevron Philippines and Chevron Malampaya to Udenna Corp. Two of the eight, lawyers Loida Nicolas Lewis and Rodel Rodis, earlier charged directors of the subsidiaries with graft before the Ombudsman. Also impleaded in October 2021 were Udenna CEO Dennis Uy, Energy Secretary Alfonso Cusi and officials of the Philippine National Oil Company-Exploration Corp. The Philippines lost P21 billion to P42 billion in that sale, Lewis and Rodis stated.

The new complaint alleges violation of the US Securities and Exchange Act, Section 10(b) (5). The rule, promulgated by the US Securities and Exchange Commission, targets securities fraud. It prohibits acts or omissions that result in fraud or deceit in connection with the purchase or sale of any security.

The aggrieved shareholders included the complainants. Aside from Lewis and Rodis, they are Arthur Medel, Rocio Nuyda, Celia Lamkin, Eric Lachica, Ago Pedalizo and Art Garcia. They lead Fil-Ams in New York, Washington DC, California and Marianas.

Rule 10(b)(5) states: “Employment of Manipulative and Deceptive Practices – It shall be unlawful for any person, directly or indirectly, by the use of any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or of the mails or of any facility of any national securities exchange, (a) To employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud, (b) To make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading, or (c) To engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security.”

 

The complaint names Chevron, subsidiaries Chevron Philippines and Chevron Malampaya, PNOC-EC, Udenna and subsidiary UC Malampaya as respondents. They supposedly “facilitat[ed] and allow[ed] the transfer of Chevron Malampaya’s interest in a service contract in violation of an applicable Joint Operating Agreement.”

Last Friday, Senator Sherwin Gatchalian turned over to the Ombudsman his energy committee’s findings of “graft, gross neglect of duty and grave misconduct.” Urging Cusi to resign, a Senate resolution endorsed criminal and administrative charges.

Gatchalian accused Cusi of “railroading the approval of the sale of participating interest of Chevron in Malampaya gas field.” He said energy and PNOC-EC officials reneged on their duty to approve beforehand any sale by Chevron of 45-percent interest in Malampaya. PNOC-EC with ten-percent interest had the option to match Chevron’s $565-million sale to Udenna. The $565 million was paid over one year mostly with borrowed money and partly with Chevron’s own earnings from Malampaya in that period, the earlier graft case stated.

Denying any wrongdoing, Cusi refused to resign. President Rodrigo Duterte stated that the deal was aboveboard. Uy, reportedly Duterte’s biggest presidential campaign contributor in 2016, said the sale was a “purely private transaction” between Chevron and Udenna subsidiaries.

More than a dozen protesting business and law associations invoked “national interest.” Udenna supposedly had no experience and knowhow in petroleum exploration and production. As well, that state-owned China National Offshore Oil Corporation will join the Malampaya operation.

Near Malampaya, within the Philippines’ exclusive economic zone, is Sampaguita gas field, Recto Bank, said to contain three times more petroleum. Malampaya supplies more than 30 percent of Luzon’s electricity. Operational failures can cause prolonged power blackouts – and shut down factories, water and telecom facilities, hospitals, malls, shops, offices and schools. Not to mention no electricity in homes.

“The assets in Malampaya belong to the Filipino people; we hope our leaders will do their best to protect it for future generations,” Rodis declared before filing the US case.

Sinovac safety efficacy and price still need clarifying

* * *

Catch “Sapol” radio show, Saturdays, 8-10 a.m., dwIZ (882-AM)

            “Gotcha: An Exposé on the Philippine Government” is available as e-book and paperback. Get a free copy of “Chapter 1: Beijing’s Bullying and Duplicity”. Simply subscribe to my newsletter HERE. Book orders also accepted there.

Sinovac safety efficacy and price still need clarifying

Opposition can beat Bongbong if 1-on-1

Opposition can beat Bongbong if 1-on-1

by | Apr 12, 2023 | Gotcha

PNA photos of Leni Robredo, Manny Pacquiao, Isko Moreno, Ping Lacson and Bongbong Marcos (left to right)
Facebook page photo of Leody de Guzman 

GOTCHA

written on February 9, 2022

 

 

Five “non-administration” presidential aspirants musn’t race each other to be No. 2. Only first place matters. Leni Robredo, Manny Pacquiao, Isko Moreno, Ping Lacson and Leody de Guzman know that.

Their internal and all independent surveys show Bongbong Marcos leading, 47-53 percent, largely from social media propaganda. The five’s combined rating is less than or equals BBM’s. Only six percent is undecided, and 12 percent at most convincible like in the past to switch sides as command votes.

Three months to Election Day, none of the five can chip at BBM’s margin. Pinning hopes on invalidating BBM’s candidacy, though legally solid, is iffy.

Four of the five must slide out, and put up the strongest against BBM – one-on-one. The only chance to fulfill their campaign promises is to coalesce with the others.

Common platforms can be basis of unity. All five abhor corruption. They hail government’s recovery from BBM’s family of P174 billion in plundered wealth and litigation of P125 billion more. They denounce the administration’s P42-billion procurement of pricey pandemic supplies from Pharmally and other Chinese fly-by-nights of presidential adviser Michael Yang. Shielding those deals from Senate investigation is President Rodrigo Duterte, appointer of the procurers and father of BBM’s running mate Sara Duterte-Carpio. Parties led by plunder convicts and indictees support the BBM-Sara ticket. Sara’s rating: 45 percent.

The five espouse honest leadership by example. All pledge to disclose annual Statements of Assets, Liabilities and Net Worth, as required by law. BBM refuses, echoing Duterte that divulging his SALNs will only open him to political attack.

The five want legislation against political dynasties. A drive against drug traffickers but heals victims. Protection of Filipino fishermen against harassment by Chinese coast guards and armed militia in Philippine seas. BBM has dynasties in Luzon and the Visayas; Sara in Mindanao. Both praise Duterte’s drug war that has killed 7,000 street pushers and users. Belittling Filipino patrols, BBM ignores China’s sea aggression.

The five need to pull together blocs from Left and Right. Robredo already has the national and social democrats; their ideology and economic goals jibe with those of socialists de Guzman and VP running mate Walden Bello. Robredo and Moreno have youth following; Robredo again, and Lacson inspire the middle class. The poor boy roots of Moreno and Pacquiao give hope to the downtrodden. Pacquiao by faith attracts religious charismatics, while Lacson, by training, police-military families.

Church hierarchs can help cohese the five. They wouldn’t want another president aligned with one who curses God and the Creation, treats lightly rape and mass killings and maligns women and critics. NGOs note that the five’s concern for health, education, housing, labor and agriculture complement. Large campaign contributors can shut off the faucet until the five join forces. They’re smart and will bet only on a winner, not five sure losers.

Disunity spells defeat, electoral history teaches, like Imelda Marcos and Danding Cojuangco in 1992, Fernando Poe Jr. and Lacson in 2004, Mar Roxas and Grace Poe in 2016. Other lands promote coalescing: in France, 79 percent forecast Emmanuel Macron’s second term by only a slim margin. So he’s striving to charm as many small parties as he can.

 

Duterte has cussed Robredo as “dumb,” Pacquiao as “punch drunk,” Moreno as “callboy” and Lacson as “crooked.” It would be foolish to believe he would now endorse one of them. Notwithstanding Duterte’s popularity and his ruling party’s campaign war chest, such endorsement could backfire. The endorsee will be branded as “Katas ng Pharmally at Malampaya.”

Duterte’s playbook is apparent: something about getting the “cocaine addict” disqualified post-election, then elevating the elected VP to president. That only means the five non-administration “presidentiables” should also pick the most winnable among their running mates.

Hapless bus riders between Metro Manila and north Luzon have found a champion in former senator Nikki Coseteng. A regular commuter to Baguio, she finds cruel the forced alighting at a common bus terminal in Bocaue, Bulacan, 30 kilometers from the capital. Finding a city bus to Bocaue is hell, let alone getting off at the highway for a tricycle ride to the terminal. Manila-bound riders must get off there too, taking two or more rides to final destinations. Laborious even without luggage, merchandise or children in tow.

Coseteng told Sapol-dwIZ Saturday of fellow-passengers’ travails. A single mom in La Union buys and sells apparel from Divisoria. She used to alight at the bus line’s private depot in Caloocan, then hop on a jitney to market. Transport authorities now forbid provincial buses from proceeding to the city where they “clog up EDSA;” yet that line doesn’t even traverse EDSA. A broom-maker grandpa in Cagayan totes his wares to Cubao and must now change buses at Bocaue. Vacationers and fatigued workers must endure a “hare-brained policy,” Coseteng said.

The hassle discourages commuting. “Trade and tourism officials say, ‘Let’s reopen and move the economy’,” Coseteng noted. “How do you move the economy if you can’t move people?”

Blaming provincial buses for EDSA traffic is unfair, Coseteng added: “Twelve thousand city and provincial buses ply EDSA versus 250,000 private cars. It’s obvious who’s causing the jams. How many more people can fit into a bus’ 30-square-meter capacity, if authorities provide vehicle owners efficient public transport? I can drive my car to Baguio, but I took buses to relax and sleep. Not anymore.”

The option is to take “colorum” private vans. Those un-franchised transports have no ticket, accident insurance, safe distancing and backup in case of breakdown. Fare is three to ten times more than on regulated buses.

Bus operators are losing money to the illegal vans. They get fined up to P1 million for going out of route but colorums go scot-free. They can’t complain, however, lest they anger regulators, Coseteng said. Operators just hope their and the commuters’ plight will change when the administration steps down in end-June.

Sinovac safety efficacy and price still need clarifying

* * *

Catch “Sapol” radio show, Saturdays, 8-10 a.m., dwIZ (882-AM)

            “Gotcha: An Exposé on the Philippine Government” is available as e-book and paperback. Get a free copy of “Chapter 1: Beijing’s Bullying and Duplicity”. Simply subscribe to my newsletter HERE. Book orders also accepted there.

Sinovac safety efficacy and price still need clarifying

Document can prove Yang ‘profited’ from Pharmally

Document can prove Yang ‘profited’ from Pharmally

by | Apr 12, 2023 | Gotcha

PNA photo of Michael Yang

GOTCHA

written on February 4, 2022

 

 

Presidential adviser Michael Yang likely profited from Pharmally Pharmaceutical’s multibillion-peso government deals and was not a mere guarantor. Senator Richard Gordon deduced this from a document that shows Yang’s nominee Lin Weixiong to have access to Pharmally’s bank deposits.

The document, a corporate secretary’s certificate to Pharmally’s bank, authorizes Lin to withdraw from and monitor the firm’s account.

“This allowed Lin to take out money for the person who placed him in Pharmally – Michael Yang,” Gordon told The STAR, showing a copy of the paper.

The certificate identifies Lin, a Taiwanese, as Pharmally’s “financial manager.” That further belies the testimony of Lin’s Filipino wife, Rose Nono Lin, disavowing any association with the company. On the other hand, it brings Gordon’s Blue Ribbon committee closer to proving Yang’s direct monetary interest.

Only six months old and undercapitalized at P625,000, Pharmally began selling pandemic supplies to the government in March 2020. Its first deal with Procurement Service-Dept. of Budget and Management was for P54 million in face masks. Thereafter it sold PS-DBM up to P12 billion in face shields, COVID-19 test kits, thermometers, goggles and personal protective equipment. Filipino manufacturers were eased out of the “emergency procurements”.

The BRC faulted then PS-DBM chief Lloyd Christopher Lao and deputy Warren Rex Liong for alleged overpriced deals. President Rodrigo Duterte has admitted appointing his college fraternity-mates and Davao City lawyers to the agency. After a few appearances at the BRC hearings, Lao went into hiding. Liong is now Overall Deputy Ombudsman.

Yang, a Chinese national residing in Davao, was also Duterte’s special economic adviser in 2016-2019. As such, Yang introduced to the President Taiwanese fugitive Huang Tzu Yen and Lin as potential investors through Pharmally Biological Corp.

Lin’s wife Rose, a candidate for congresswoman in Quezon City, claimed at the BRC hearing that they and Yang were involved only in Pharmally Biological, never in Pharmally Pharmaceutical. But Gordon confronted her with a document from the Bureau of Internal Revenue stating that Lin was financial manager of Pharmally Pharmaceutical. Huang, Pharmally Pharmaceutical chairman, and Mojit Dargani, corporate secretary-board treasurer-executive director, affirmed the BIR record. Rose claimed that Lin, who snubbed all the hearings, is on prolonged business travel in Dubai.

 

Lin’s wife Rose, a candidate for congresswoman in Quezon City, claimed at the BRC hearing that they and Yang were involved only in Pharmally Biological, never in Pharmally Pharmaceutical. But Gordon confronted her with a document from the Bureau of Internal Revenue stating that Lin was financial manager of Pharmally Pharmaceutical. Huang, Pharmally Pharmaceutical chairman, and Mojit Dargani, corporate secretary-board treasurer-executive director, affirmed the BIR record. Rose claimed that Lin, who snubbed all the hearings, is on prolonged business travel in Dubai.

Signed by Lin and Dargani, Gordon’s newest document is addressed to Pharmally’s bank. It empowers them to:

• “deposit any of its funds… and said bank is hereby authorized to pay, encash and honor any and all checks, bills of exchange, orders or other instruments for the payment of money or withdrawal of funds;”

• “apply, negotiate for and obtain credit facilities” and

• “access the account through electronic banking.”

“Colorum” (un-franchised) vehicles have taken over bus routes to and from north-central Luzon and Metro Manila. Those private vans and cars load beyond safe, comfy limits. Passengers are charged three times the regulated bus fares, yet have no receipt, accident insurance or alternative rides in case of breakdown. Pandemic health protocols are unenforced.

The illegal “public transport” thrives from poor government planning. Provincial bus lines have been barred from using their private terminals in the national capital since February 2021. Officials make them start and end at a common terminal in Bocaue, Bulacan. Instead of from the usual Cubao, Quezon City, passengers must first ride a city bus 30 kilometers, alight at the expressway and hail a tricycle to the common terminal. Same when they return to the big city. Inconvenient even if they have no luggage, merchandise or tots to take care of.

Provincial bus operators are groaning. They had zero income from the yearlong pandemic lockdown of Luzon. When trips resumed in 2021, they were restricted to only 10-30 percent passenger capacity for safe distancing. Yet they were required to continue renewing and paying for their franchises and taxes. Drivers, conductors, mechanics had to be retained and paid. Buses had to be maintained. Government couldn’t stamp out the colorums yet bus firms were fined up to P1 million and suspended for any breach of franchise and common terminal use. Drivers must be in top shape, yet have no sleeping quarters there. Terminal parking fees add to the overhead.

The operators had won a court injunction against an earlier transport department closure of their private garages in July 2019. But the generals and lawyers handling pandemic response use the health emergency as reason to supersede the judicial ruling. Buses must have “special permits” to operate, or else be pulled over.

Officials justify the common terminal with their supposed strictness with masking, hand washing, safe distancing and vaxxing rules. They also fault operators for the overcrowding and 200-meter long queues to the private city terminals last Christmas-New Year. Yet that was the officials’ own doing; they had announced special reuse of the private garages only two days before the holidays, leaving the operators little time to mobilize their staff and fleets, and prepare the health necessities for the mad rush of riders.

How long do transport and economic officials intend to impose the unworkable plan? They must ensure safe, reliable, convenient rides. As well, regulate fares, standards, routes, frequencies, work conditions and public health. Soon aboveground operators will close down from unfair competition with underground colorums. Government will lose another source of revenues.

Sinovac safety efficacy and price still need clarifying

* * *

Catch “Sapol” radio show, Saturdays, 8-10 a.m., dwIZ (882-AM)

            “Gotcha: An Exposé on the Philippine Government” is available as e-book and paperback. Get a free copy of “Chapter 1: Beijing’s Bullying and Duplicity”. Simply subscribe to my newsletter HERE. Book orders also accepted there.

Sinovac safety efficacy and price still need clarifying

Guanzon to Bongbong: Did you bribe somebody in Comelec?

Guanzon to Bongbong: Did you bribe somebody in Comelec?

by | Apr 12, 2023 | Gotcha

PNA photos of Rowena Guanzon (left) and Bongbong Marcos (right)

GOTCHA

written on February 2, 2022

 

 

How did Bongbong Marcos’ party learn that the vote to disqualify him as presidential candidate was a “minority opinion?” Commissioner on Elections Rowena Guanzon demanded explanations since the three-member First Division that she heads has yet to release its decision. “Did you pay off anybody here at the Comelec?” she asked Marcos through radio show Sapol-dwIZ Saturday.

Guanzon pressed Commissioner-on-case Aimee Ferolino to finish drafting the “overdue ruling.” Thence Guanzon and Commissioner Marlon Casquejo can sign either to concur or dissent. Only then can they release the division verdict, Guanzon explained the procedure. Only then too would the public know whose are the majority and minority opinions, if any.

Guanzon last Thursday told GMA News her vote to DQ Marcos as convicted tax evader. But an influential senator was allegedly delaying release of the Division ruling till after her retirement today, Feb. 2.

Marcos’ Partido Federal Pilipinas accused Guanzon on Friday of “illegally leaking” her “dissenting [and] minority opinion” to DQ. PFP general counsel George Briones asked the Comelec en banc to sanction Guanzon and forfeit her retirement pay.

“Does that mean they paid off somebody?” Guanzon shot back. Ferolino has yet to relay her ponencia (draft ruling) to Guanzon and Casquejo. “Why do they (PFP) know that mine is the minority vote… and that I lost?”

“So, Bongbong, tell the public: Did you bribe a commissioner, yes or no?” Guanzon challenged.

Guanzon said she broke no rules by divulging her vote. What would have been wrong was if anyone disclosed their division ruling before promulgation to the DQ petitioners and respondent Marcos. “But the privilege of secret vote is mine,” Guanzon clarified. “If I want to disclose my vote I can do so.”

Guanzon said Saturday it has been 19 days since the Marcos DQ case was raffled off to Ferolino on Jan. 10. Their division has an agreement to finish any ponencia in seven days, Guanzon said. Ferolino had sought more time because her staff lawyer, then she, went on self-quarantine for COVID-19. “But the quarantine period is past; besides, one can write drafts while in quarantine; we all do that,” Guanzon added. She prides herself in zero backlog in case disposal.

Guanzon hurried up Ferolino with her draft “so that neither of us can be accused of taking bribes.” Marcos’ campaign war chest is vaunted to be the biggest among presidential aspirants. Much of it allegedly comes from unrecovered billions of pesos plundered by his dictator-father Ferdinand Marcos Sr. in the 1960s-1980s.

Guanzon’s division first heard on Jan. 7 consolidated petitions to DQ Marcos. Those pertain to his perpetual bar from public office, under the National Internal Revenue Code, for not filing income tax returns in 1982, 1983, 1984 and 1985. As well, automatic bar under the Omnibus Election Code for any convict of crime involving moral turpitude.

Guanzon told Sapol she already gave the summary of case facts and her DQ explanation to Ferolino. If still unable to finish the ponencia way past deadline, Ferolino could pass on the job to Casquejo, Guanzon said. Guanzon could write it herself if not for a rule that no ponencia be assigned one month before a division head’s retirement.

Marcos has not satisfied the court sentence to pay his tax deficiencies and surcharges from 1982-1985 and P30,000 penalty, Guanzon said. Marcos’ bank receipt as proof of payment to the BIR of deficiencies and surcharges, stating “for lease rentals,” is a mere photocopy and not certified as true for legal proceedings. The Quezon City court that convicted him attested that he has not paid the P30,000 penalty.

Not only the non-payments constituted moral turpitude, Guanzon said. That Marcos did it for four consecutive years, when he was vice governor then governor of Ilocos and the son of the president-for-life, showed impunity in lawbreaking.

The Comelec Second Division earlier dismissed a separate case to invalidate Marcos’ candidacy for perjuring in the certificate. He had claimed to be eligible to run and denied any previous conviction.

That case became controversial. The petitioners complained that Marcos’ spokesman displayed “undue, intimate, insider familiarity with the Commission.” That spokesman is not a Marcos Jr. “counsel on record, therefore an outsider.” Yet he announced in the morning of Nov. 18 that they had been granted the previous day, Nov. 17, a deadline extension to answer. The Second Division granted that extension only in the afternoon of Nov. 18.

Sinovac safety efficacy and price still need clarifying

* * *

Catch “Sapol” radio show, Saturdays, 8-10 a.m., dwIZ (882-AM)

            “Gotcha: An Exposé on the Philippine Government” is available as e-book and paperback. Get a free copy of “Chapter 1: Beijing’s Bullying and Duplicity”. Simply subscribe to my newsletter HERE. Book orders also accepted there.

Sinovac safety efficacy and price still need clarifying

What will Bongbong do if he becomes president

What will Bongbong do if he becomes president

by | Apr 12, 2023 | Gotcha

PNA photo of Bongbong Marcos

GOTCHA

written on January 28, 2022

 

 

President wannabe Bongbong Marcos denies knowledge of his family’s ill-gotten wealth. Yet only three years ago his mother, former first lady Imelda Romualdez Marcos, was convicted of seven counts of graft involving $200 million. Proven before the Sandiganbayan was that she deposited the amount in seven Swiss bank accounts during her 1980s tenure as assemblywoman, housing minister and Metro Manila head. BBM was already adult in the ‘80s, the vice governor then governor of Ilocos, and being groomed in politics by his father, dictator Ferdinand Marcos.

BBM shuns media interviews in which he expects the wealth issue to be raised. He insists it’s not of any election interest.

That fuels suspicion of a hidden agenda in aspiring for the highest office. Does he intend to insert minions in the Presidential Commission on Good Government to let the Marcoses retake P174 billion in confiscated cash, real estate, bonds, commercial papers and jewelry? Then abolish the PCGG to stop it from recovering P125 billion more in plundered assets?

The Bureau of Internal Revenue in 1991 assessed P23.3 billion in estate tax of Marcos Sr. who died two years prior. BBM, the estate administrator, has ignored collection notices for three decades. With interest and surcharges, the arrears have since ballooned to P203.8 billion.

If BBM becomes president, will he instruct the subordinate BIR to waive the P203.8 billion? Not farfetched. Tax evasion is a BBM habit. That’s why he was convicted of four counts of failure to file yearly income tax returns while an Ilocos official in 1982, 1983, 1984 and 1985.

Online trolls claim that poor BBM and family were in Honolulu exile in those years. False. He was very much in the Philippines until they fled the People Power Revolt in February 1986.

BBM says he will not disclose his annual Statement of Assets, Liabilities and Net Worth if he becomes president. That’s despite the SALN being the first measure of a public official’s probity. BBM claims that publicizing SALNs, a Constitutional requirement, only opens an officeholder to political harassment. He makes it sound as if government position is a huge sacrifice and not a dynastic motive.

As senator in 2010-2016, BBM did not voluntarily release his SALNs. The Senate Secretariat posted the SALNs of all by majority decision.

From his SALNs, BBM declared a net worth of P600,000 on becoming a congressman in 1992. By 2010 when he became senator, it had grown to P315.55 million. By midterm in 2013, it was P442 million.

Also in the 2013 SALN, BBM stated a second net worth computation of P197.47 million, based on real property tax declarations. The P442 million supposedly was based on property appraisal.

During the 2016 vice presidential election debate, BBM could not answer fellow-candidates’ questions on how his personal wealth had expanded exponentially. He was jobless between tenures and his only income source was public office, which pays low. He had no businesses, having closed down three unprofitable start-ups in 2013.

BBM was implicated in Janet Lim Napoles’ pork barrel scam of 2013. Whistleblower Benhur Luy testified at the Senate inquiry that BBM had placed P100 million in nine ghost projects of four bogus Napoles NGOs. But Luy’s computer files submitted as evidence showed that BBM channeled up to P360 million in 2011 and 2012.

Of the 25 past and sitting senators in Luy’s roster, only three were indicted: Juan Ponce Enrile, Jinggoy Estrada and Bong Revilla. Nothing has been heard since 2016 of a complaint of P205-million pork barrel plunder against BBM, filed by university students.

Enrile, Estrada and Revilla now support BBM’s presidential run. So does former president Gloria Macapagal Arroyo, also previously indicted twice for P366-million plunder of charity sweepstakes funds and the $329-million national broadband network-ZTE scam.

Sinovac safety efficacy and price still need clarifying

* * *

Catch “Sapol” radio show, Saturdays, 8-10 a.m., dwIZ (882-AM)

            “Gotcha: An Exposé on the Philippine Government” is available as e-book and paperback. Get a free copy of “Chapter 1: Beijing’s Bullying and Duplicity”. Simply subscribe to my newsletter HERE. Book orders also accepted there.

Sinovac safety efficacy and price still need clarifying

Marcos Jr. avoids tough hearings, public interviews for tough job

Marcos Jr. avoids tough hearings, public interviews for tough job

by | Apr 12, 2023 | Gotcha

Wikipedia photo of Bongbong Marcos

GOTCHA

written on January 26, 2022

 

 

In 1986, Ferdinand Marcos Sr. evaded facing on television his only opponent in the presidential election, the widow Cory Aquino. Top-rate American talk-show host Ted Koppel was set to interview them, but the dictator kept delaying it for weeks.

Three days before the Friday Election Day, Marcos alibied that their first TV appearance together should be on a Philippine, not foreign, network. A lame excuse, since it was on Koppel’s show months earlier where, in bravado reaction to reports about his waning support, Marcos had called for the snap balloting. None of the three broadcast stations of his crony Roberto Benedicto or the government outlet wanted to sponsor the face-off.

The only three newspapers, owned by his brother-in-law Kokoy Romualdez, his aide Hans Menzi and Benedicto, carried solely his “praise” releases. Photos of him staggering up the stage and being rushed away by bodyguards on a stretcher, bleeding from a secret organ transplant were censored. False news were being published that Cory was avoiding the one-on-one when in fact, as Koppel confirmed, she had agreed to the topics and format.

Koppel reset their interview one last time for Wednesday night, US time, Thursday noon in Manila. Marcos was saved by the bell, as the Comelec reminded that all campaigning must end by Wednesday midnight, Philippine time. Marcos went on to steal the votes as planned.

Last Saturday, Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr. snubbed a TV appearance with fellow presidential aspirants Ping Lacson, Isko Moreno, Manny Pacquiao and Leni Robredo. His spokesman claimed that the interviewer, veteran journalist Jessica Soho, was “biased.”

 

“Spoken like a true son of a dictator,” Congresswoman Arlene Brosas remarked of Marcos Jr.’s attack against the multi-awarded Soho’s credibility. “A clear act of cowardice and a sneak peek on how bad he will treat the media if he wins the presidency” in May 2022.

Calling Marcos’ declining to join “unfortunate,” Soho’s GMA network stated: “In this must-see special, Ms. Soho boldly asks the presidential aspirants the questions that need to be asked – their intentions behind running for the position, the controversies thrown at them, their stand on pressing issues and their concrete plans should they be elected. The questions are tough because the job of the presidency is tough.”

Marcos Jr. explained that he didn’t want to talk about anticipated questions on his father’s human rights violations and plunder of state coffers. He wished to expound only on pressing issues like unemployment and the pandemic – about which Soho did ask the other candidates.

In 2016, Marcos Jr. also skipped the face-off of vice presidential bets on ABS-CBN network. Netizens asked why. Was it because, in the Comelec-organized debate days before, he couldn’t answer rivals’ direct questions about the doubling of his personal wealth to P250 million when he had no business or job other than being senator.

Last Jan. 7, Marcos Jr. absented himself from the hearing of the Comelec First Division on his disqualification case. That was despite Commissioner Rowena Guanzon’s stern reminder for the DQ petitioners, respondent Marcos Jr. and their lawyers to attend and prepare. His counsel said he was in self-isolation after close contact with two aides who tested positive for COVID-19.

Can’t he show up even for a moment, even via teleconferencing, Guanzon asked. No, the counsel replied, he was avoiding contaminating others.

A medical certificate was later publicized, stating that Marcos Jr. already was slightly feverish and had extremely sore throat the previous morning. Yet, netizens noted, he had hour-long early morning and late afternoon broadcast interviews that day and had mentioned nothing about it.

Marcos Jr.’s camp seems to have an uncanny ability to prophesy interview questions and events. This showed late last year in a separate petition to invalidate his candidacy. The petitioners took exception to his spokesman’s “undue, intimate, insider familiarity with the Commission.” That spokesman is not a Marcos Jr. “counsel on record, therefore an outsider.” Yet he announced in the morning of Nov. 18 that they had been granted the previous day, Nov. 17, a deadline extension to answer. The Second Division acted only in the afternoon of Nov. 18.

That Second Division junked the other week the petition against Marcos Jr.’s candidacy. The case is on appeal before the Comelec en banc, with a request for the three Second Division commissioners to inhibit themselves.

Guanzon’s First Division is rushing to rule on the separate DQ before she retires next month along with Comelec Chairman Sheriff Abas and Commissioner Antonio Kho Jr. of the Second Division. The case cites the perpetual ban from public office of tax evaders like Marcos Jr., and the automatic DQ of any candidate previously convicted for a crime involving moral turpitude.

 

Sinovac safety efficacy and price still need clarifying

* * *

Catch “Sapol” radio show, Saturdays, 8-10 a.m., dwIZ (882-AM)

            “Gotcha: An Exposé on the Philippine Government” is available as e-book and paperback. Get a free copy of “Chapter 1: Beijing’s Bullying and Duplicity”. Simply subscribe to my newsletter HERE. Book orders also accepted there.

Sinovac safety efficacy and price still need clarifying

Site Terms & Conditions (scroll down for the buttons)

This site, jariusbondoc.com, is free for your use.

However, we do have some terms and conditions which you can find below. By continuing to use or to read from this site, that means you understand and agree to comply with the terms and conditions.

I. PRIVACY POLICY

This privacy policy (“policy”) will help you understand how jariusbondoc.com uses and protects the data you provide to us when you visit and use https://jariusbondoc.com/ (“website”, “service”).

We reserve the right to change this policy at any given time. If you want to make sure that you are up to date with the latest changes, we advise you to frequently visit this page.

 

What User Data We Collect

When you visit the website, we may collect the following data:

  • Your IP address
  • Your contact information and email address
  • Other information such as interests and preferences
  • Data profile regarding your online behavior on our website

 

Why We Collect Your Data

We are collecting your data for several reasons:

  • To better understand your needs
  • To improve our services and products
  • To send you promotional emails containing the information we think you will find interesting
  • To contact you to fill out surveys and participate in other types of market research
  • To customize our website according to your online behavior and personal preferences

 

Safeguarding and Securing the Data

jariusbondoc.com is committed to securing your data and keeping it confidential. jariusbondoc.com has done all in its power to prevent data theft, unauthorized access, and disclosure by implementing the latest technologies and software, which help us safeguard all the information we collect online.

 

Our Cookie Policy

Once you agree to allow our website to use cookies, you also agree to use the data it collects regarding your online behavior (analyze web traffic, web pages you spend the most time on, and websites you visit).

The data we collect by using cookies is used to customize our website to your needs. After we use the data for statistical analysis, the data is completely removed from our systems.

Please note that cookies don’t allow us to gain control of your computer in any way. They are strictly used to monitor which pages you find useful and which you do not so that we can provide a better experience for you.

If you want to disable cookies, you can do it by accessing the settings of your internet browser.

 

Links to Other Websites

Our website contains links that lead to other websites. If you click on these links jariusbondoc.com is not held responsible for your data and privacy protection. Visiting those websites is not governed by this privacy policy agreement. Make sure to read the privacy policy documentation of the website you go to from our website.

 

Restricting the Collection of your Personal Data

At some point, you might wish to restrict the use and collection of your personal data. You can achieve this by doing the following:

 

  • When you are filling the forms on the website, make sure to check if there is a box which you can leave unchecked, if you don’t want to disclose your personal information.
  • If you have already agreed to share your information with us, feel free to contact us via email and we will be more than happy to change this for you.

 

jariusbondoc.com will not lease, sell or distribute your personal information to any third parties, unless we have your permission. We might do so if the law forces us. Your personal information will be used when we need to send you promotional materials if you agree to this privacy policy.

 

II. COPYRIGHT NOTICE

All materials contained on this site are protected by the Republic of the Phlippines copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of jariusbondoc.com or in the case of third party materials, the owner of that content. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notice from copies of the content.

However, you may download material from jariusbondoc.com on the Web (one machine readable copy and one print copy per page) for your personal, noncommercial use only.

If you wish to use jariusbondoc.com content for commercial purposes, such as for content syndication etc., please contact us at jariusbondoconline@gmail.com.

Links to Websites other than those owned by jariusbondoc.com are offered as a service to readers. The editorial staff of jariusbondoc.com was not involved in their production and is not responsible for their content.

 

III. TERMS OF SERVICE

 

  1. GENERAL RULES AND DEFINITIONS

 

1.1 If you choose to use the jariusbondoc.com service (the “Service”), you will be agreeing to abide by all of the terms and conditions of this Agreement between you and jariusbondoc.com (“jariusbondoc.com “).

 

1.2 jariusbondoc.com may change, add or remove portions of this Agreement at any time, but if it does so, it will post such changes on the Service, or send them to you via e-mail. It is your responsibility to review this Agreement prior to each use of the Site and by continuing to use this Site, you agree to any changes.

 

1.3 If any of these rules or any future changes are unacceptable to you, you may cancel your membership by sending e-mail to jariusbondoconline.com (see section 10.1 regarding termination of service). Your continued use of the service now, or following the posting of notice of any changes in these operating rules, will indicate acceptance by you of such rules, changes, or modifications.

 

1.4 jariusbondoc.com may change, suspend or discontinue any aspect of the Service at any time, including the availability of any Service feature, database, or content. jariusbondoc.com may also impose limits on certain features and services or restrict your access to parts or all of the Service without notice or liability.

 

  1. JARIUSBONDOC.COM CONTENT AND MEMBER SUBMISSIONS

 

2.1 The contents of the jariusbondoc.com are intended for your personal, noncommercial use. All materials published on jariusbondoc.com (including, but not limited to news articles, photographs, images, illustrations, audio clips and video clips, also known as the “Content”) are protected by copyright, and owned or controlled by jariusbondoc.com or the party credited as the provider of the Content. You shall abide by all additional copyright notices, information, or restrictions contained in any Content accessed through the Service.

 

2.2 The Service and its Contents are protected by copyright pursuant to the Republic of the Philippines and international copyright laws. You may not modify, publish, transmit, participate in the transfer or sale of, reproduce (except as provided in Section 2.3 of this Agreement), create new works from, distribute, perform, display, or in any way exploit, any of the Content or the Service (including software) in whole or in part.

 

2.3 You may download or copy the Content and other downloadable items displayed on the Service for personal use only, provided that you maintain all copyright and other notices contained therein. Copying or storing of any Content for other than personal use is expressly prohibited without prior written permission from jariusbondoc.com or the copyright holder identified in the copyright notice contained in the Content.

 

  1. FORUMS, DISCUSSIONS AND USER GENERATED CONTENT

 

3.1 You shall not upload to, or distribute or otherwise publish on the message boards (the “Feedback Section”) any libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic, abusive, or otherwise illegal material.

 

3.2 (a)Be courteous. You agree that you will not threaten or verbally abuse jariusbondoc.com columnists and other jariusbondoc.com community Members, use defamatory language, or deliberately disrupt discussions with repetitive messages, meaningless messages or “spam.”

 

3.2 (b) Use respectful language. Like any community, the Feedback Sections will flourish only when our Members feel welcome and safe. You agree not to use language that abuses or discriminates on the basis of race, religion, nationality, gender, sexual preference, age, region, disability, etc. Hate speech of any kind is grounds for immediate and permanent suspension of access to all or part of the Service.

 

3.2 (c) Debate, but don’t attack. In a community full of opinions and preferences, people always disagree. jariusbondoc.com encourages active discussions and welcomes heated debate in our Feedback Sections. But personal attacks are a direct violation of this Agreement and are grounds for immediate and permanent suspension of access to all or part of the Service.

 

3.3 The Feedback Sections shall be used only in a noncommercial manner. You shall not, without the express approval of jariusbondoc.com, distribute or otherwise publish any material containing any solicitation of funds, advertising or solicitation for goods or services.

 

3.4 You are solely responsible for the content of your messages. However, while jariusbondoc.com does not and cannot review every message posted by you on the Forums and is not responsible for the content of these messages, jariusbondoc.com reserves the right to delete, move, or edit messages that it, in its sole discretion, deems abusive, defamatory, obscene, in violation of copyright or trademark laws, or otherwise unacceptable.

 

3.5 You acknowledge that any submissions you make to the Service (i.e., user-generated content including but not limited to: text, video, audio and photographs) (each, a “Submission”) may be edited, removed, modified, published, transmitted, and displayed by jariusbondoc.com and you waive any moral rights you may have in having the material altered or changed in a manner not agreeable to you. You grant jariusbondoc.com a perpetual, nonexclusive, world-wide, royalty free, sub-licensable license to the Submissions, which includes without limitation the right for jariusbondoc.com or any third party it designates, to use, copy, transmit, excerpt, publish, distribute, publicly display, publicly perform, create derivative works of, host, index, cache, tag, encode, modify and adapt (including without limitation the right to adapt to streaming, downloading, broadcast, mobile, digital, thumbnail, scanning or other technologies) in any form or media now known or hereinafter developed, any Submission posted by you on or to jariusbondoc.com or any other website owned by it, including any Submission posted on jariusbondoc.com through a third party.

 

3.6 By submitting an entry to jariusbondoc.com’s Readers’ Corner, you are consenting to its display on the site and for related online and offline promotional uses.

 

  1. ACCESS AND AVAILABILITY OF SERVICE AND LINKS

 

4.1 jariusbondoc.com contains links to other related World Wide Web Internet sites, resources, and sponsors of jariusbondoc.com. Since jariusbondoc.com is not responsible for the availability of these outside resources, or their contents, you should direct any concerns regarding any external link to the site administrator or Webmaster of such site.

 

  1. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES

 

5.1 You represent, warrant and covenant (a) that no materials of any kind submitted through your account will (i) violate, plagiarize, or infringe upon the rights of any third party, including copyright, trademark, privacy or other personal or proprietary rights; or (ii) contain libelous or otherwise unlawful material; and (b) that you are at least thirteen years old. You hereby indemnify, defend and hold harmless jariusbondoc.com, and all officers, directors, owners, agents, information providers, affiliates, licensors and licensees (collectively, the “Indemnified Parties”) from and against any and all liability and costs, including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys’ fees, incurred by the Indemnified Parties in connection with any claim arising out of any breach by you or any user of your account of this Agreement or the foregoing representations, warranties and covenants. You shall cooperate as fully as reasonably required in the defense of any such claim. jariusbondoc.com reserves the right, at its own expense, to assume the exclusive defense and control of any matter subject to indemnification by you.

 

5.2 jariusbondoc.com does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any advice, opinion, statement, or other information displayed, uploaded, or distributed through the Service by any user, information provider or any other person or entity. You acknowledge that any reliance upon any such opinion, advice, statement, memorandum, or information shall be at your sole risk. THE SERVICE AND ALL DOWNLOADABLE SOFTWARE ARE DISTRIBUTED ON AN “AS IS” BASIS WITHOUT WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, WARRANTIES OF TITLE OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. YOU HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT USE OF THE SERVICE IS AT YOUR SOLE RISK.

 

  1. COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN JARIUSBONDOC.COM AND MEMBERS

 

6.1 If you indicate on your registration form that you want to receive such information, jariusbondoc.com, its owners and assigns, will allow certain third party vendors to provide you with information about products and services.

 

6.2 jariusbondoc.com reserves the right to send electronic mail to you for the purpose of informing you of changes or additions to the Service.

 

6.3 jariusbondoc.com reserves the right to disclose information about your usage and demographics, provided that it will not reveal your personal identity in connection with the disclosure of such information. Advertisers and/or Licensees on our Web site may collect and share information about you only if you indicate your acceptance. For more information please read the Privacy Policy of jariusbondoc.com.

 

6.4 jariusbondoc.com may contact you via e-mail regarding your participation in user surveys, asking for feedback on the Website and existing or prospective products and services. This information will be used to improve our Website and better understand our users, and any information we obtain in such surveys will not be shared with third parties, except in aggregate form.

 

  1. TERMINATION

 

 

7.1 jariusbondoc.com may, in its sole discretion, terminate or suspend your access to all or part of the Service for any reason, including, without limitation, breach or assignment of this Agreement.

 

  1. MISCELLANEOUS

 

8.1 This Agreement has been made in and shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the Republic of the Philippines law. Any action to enforce this agreement shall be brought in the courts located in Manila, Philippines.

 

8.2 Notwithstanding any of the foregoing, nothing in this Terms of Service will serve to preempt the promises made in jariusbondoc.com Privacy Policy.

 

8.3 Correspondence should be sent to jariusbondoconline.com.

 

8.4 You agree to report any copyright violations of the Terms of Service to jariusbondoc.com as soon as you become aware of them. In the event you have a claim of copyright infringement with respect to material that is contained in the jariusbondoc.com service, please notify jariusbondoconline.com. This Terms of Service was last updated on November 7, 2020.